Employee Turnover Prediction on Synthetic and Real Datasets

When an employee leaves the job, it leads to issues such as financial losses, loss of productivity, re-employment costs, the adaptation period for the new employee, and loss of time. Many studies are dedicated to predicting employee turnover to avoid these negative impacts. In this study, we train classic machine learning models to predict employee turnover. We train Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, XGBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, and Support Vector Machine methods. We use two publicly available datasets: IBM's synthetic data and an anonymous US company's real data. We compare the outcomes of models trained by collected real datasets and models trained by synthetically generated datasets. For the IBM dataset, with 92% accuracy and 0.92 f1-score, Random Forest demonstrates superior results. Additionally, Random Forest out- performed other models with 89% accuracy and 0.89 f1-score for the US company's dataset. All applied classification models demonstrated better results on the synthetic data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ubmk63289.2024.10773575
Citations
3
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employee Turnover Prediction on Synthetic and Real Datasets

Kadir Yunus Koc, Azhar Murzaeva, Volkan İllik
3 citations
AI and HR Technologies
2.02
article

Employee Turnover Prediction on Synthetic and Real Datasets

Kadir Yunus Koc, Azhar Murzaeva, Volkan İllik
article en
3 citations

Abstract

When an employee leaves the job, it leads to issues such as financial losses, loss of productivity, re-employment costs, the adaptation period for the new employee, and loss of time. Many studies are dedicated to predicting employee turnover to avoid these negative impacts. In this study, we train classic machine learning models to predict employee turnover. We train Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, XGBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Ada Boosting, and Support Vector Machine methods. We use two publicly available datasets: IBM's synthetic data and an anonymous US company's real data. We compare the outcomes of models trained by collected real datasets and models trained by synthetically generated datasets. For the IBM dataset, with 92% accuracy and 0.92 f1-score, Random Forest demonstrates superior results. Additionally, Random Forest out- performed other models with 89% accuracy and 0.89 f1-score for the US company's dataset. All applied classification models demonstrated better results on the synthetic data.

Software (Spain) (ES)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI and HR Technologies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.