Evaluating Deep Learning Models for Prediction of Climate Conditions in Greenhouse

This study evaluates the performance of four representative deep learning models-1D CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), LSTM (Long-Short Term Memory), DNN (Deep Neural Network), and Transformer-for environmental prediction in smart greenhouses using 13 sensing data. Data collected at one-minute intervals over nine months were used to compare the prediction performance for temperature, humidity, and CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> levels at three different time intervals (5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes). The results showed that prediction errors increased as the time interval grew larger. Predictions within 30 minutes were deemed applicable for complex environmental control in smart farm systems, while predictions for 60 minutes ahead could be used to forecast general trends. This approach can support more precise environmental control through proactive predictive management in smart greenhouses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icce-asia63397.2024.10773673
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Deep Learning Models for Prediction of Climate Conditions in Greenhouse

Kwang‐Ju Kim, Jae-Young Kim, Jin-Hong Kim, Yun-Won Choi et al.
1 citations
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
0.60
article

Evaluating Deep Learning Models for Prediction of Climate Conditions in Greenhouse

Kwang‐Ju Kim, Jae-Young Kim, Jin-Hong Kim, Yun-Won Choi, Byoung-Ju Yun, Seong-Geun Kwon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of four representative deep learning models-1D CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), LSTM (Long-Short Term Memory), DNN (Deep Neural Network), and Transformer-for environmental prediction in smart greenhouses using 13 sensing data. Data collected at one-minute intervals over nine months were used to compare the prediction performance for temperature, humidity, and CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> levels at three different time intervals (5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes). The results showed that prediction errors increased as the time interval grew larger. Predictions within 30 minutes were deemed applicable for complex environmental control in smart farm systems, while predictions for 60 minutes ahead could be used to forecast general trends. This approach can support more precise environmental control through proactive predictive management in smart greenhouses.

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR), Kyungil University (KR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.