Influential Factors in rPPG: Insights from a Diverse and Inclusive Empirical Study

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) allows to optically measure vital signs, such as heart rate, without physical contact. Signal quality impacts the reliability of derived measurements, but the effects of influential factors in rPPG are not well understood. This research specifically examines five factors that are hypothesized to be important: camera type, skin tone, age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). We investigated these factors using a purposely collected dataset from a comparatively large and diverse population (n=126). For each participant, two simultaneous video streams were recorded using different quality hardware to allow to study the effect of choice of camera type. Statistical analysis based on two quality metrics (signal-to-noise ratio and mean absolute error in heart rate measurements) shows that the choice of camera type is important. Generalized linear mixed models provide evidence of a compounded effect between low quality camera and young age with respect to both signal quality decrease and an increase in measurement error. Analysis of the models coefficients brings evidences that darker skin tone also appears to reduce signal quality, but the results are statistically inconclusive in what concerns heart rate measurements. We observe no significant effect of gender or BMI on rPPG in this study. We believe that comprehensive understanding of the influential factors in rPPG will lead to more reliable and inclusive technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bsn63547.2024.10780670
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influential Factors in rPPG: Insights from a Diverse and Inclusive Empirical Study

Catherine Proulx, Linda Pecora, Thomas Vaughan, Richard Bernhardt et al.
2 citations
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.98
article

Influential Factors in rPPG: Insights from a Diverse and Inclusive Empirical Study

Catherine Proulx, Linda Pecora, Thomas Vaughan, Richard Bernhardt, Sebastián M. Torres, Michael Lim, Sofia Auer, David Rivest‐Hénault, Kendall Ho, Nooshin Jafari, Di Jiang, Titilola Yakubu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) allows to optically measure vital signs, such as heart rate, without physical contact. Signal quality impacts the reliability of derived measurements, but the effects of influential factors in rPPG are not well understood. This research specifically examines five factors that are hypothesized to be important: camera type, skin tone, age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). We investigated these factors using a purposely collected dataset from a comparatively large and diverse population (n=126). For each participant, two simultaneous video streams were recorded using different quality hardware to allow to study the effect of choice of camera type. Statistical analysis based on two quality metrics (signal-to-noise ratio and mean absolute error in heart rate measurements) shows that the choice of camera type is important. Generalized linear mixed models provide evidence of a compounded effect between low quality camera and young age with respect to both signal quality decrease and an increase in measurement error. Analysis of the models coefficients brings evidences that darker skin tone also appears to reduce signal quality, but the results are statistically inconclusive in what concerns heart rate measurements. We observe no significant effect of gender or BMI on rPPG in this study. We believe that comprehensive understanding of the influential factors in rPPG will lead to more reliable and inclusive technologies.

University of British Columbia (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.