Multimodal Markers of Transdiagnostic Childhood Mental Health Impairment

Childhood mental health problems are impairing, predictive of health problems later in life, and becoming increasingly prevalent. A critical first step toward addressing this growing crisis is facilitating more widespread screening; however, gold-standard assessments remain subjective, time-consuming, largely unable to capture subthreshold conditions and comorbidity, and limited by access to the clinical experts needed to provide and interpret the results. In response, researchers have developed digital phenotype screening tools that capture and utilize objective physiological and behavioral measures to augment traditional mental health screening. However, the efficacy of these tools has traditionally been evaluated on their ability to predict mental health diagnoses. In contrast, in this work and in line with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, we explore the utility of these objective measures for quantifying trans diagnostic severity of impairment across a range of widely used clinical measurements. Using canonical correlation analysis, we find that linear combinations of movement and audio features extracted from smartphone sensor data collected during short (< 7 minutes) objective assessments are significantly correlated with a range of widely used clinical measurements. These findings suggest that easy-to-collect objective physiological and behavioral measures are indicative of severity across a range of psychopathologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bsn63547.2024.10780528
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Markers of Transdiagnostic Childhood Mental Health Impairment

Bryn C. Loftness, Josh Cherian, Ryan S. McGinnis, Julia Halvorson-Phelan et al.
1 citations
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
article

Multimodal Markers of Transdiagnostic Childhood Mental Health Impairment

Bryn C. Loftness, Josh Cherian, Ryan S. McGinnis, Julia Halvorson-Phelan, Jenna G. Cohen, Ellen W. McGinnis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Childhood mental health problems are impairing, predictive of health problems later in life, and becoming increasingly prevalent. A critical first step toward addressing this growing crisis is facilitating more widespread screening; however, gold-standard assessments remain subjective, time-consuming, largely unable to capture subthreshold conditions and comorbidity, and limited by access to the clinical experts needed to provide and interpret the results. In response, researchers have developed digital phenotype screening tools that capture and utilize objective physiological and behavioral measures to augment traditional mental health screening. However, the efficacy of these tools has traditionally been evaluated on their ability to predict mental health diagnoses. In contrast, in this work and in line with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, we explore the utility of these objective measures for quantifying trans diagnostic severity of impairment across a range of widely used clinical measurements. Using canonical correlation analysis, we find that linear combinations of movement and audio features extracted from smartphone sensor data collected during short (< 7 minutes) objective assessments are significantly correlated with a range of widely used clinical measurements. These findings suggest that easy-to-collect objective physiological and behavioral measures are indicative of severity across a range of psychopathologies.

University of Vermont (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.