A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Boosting Algorithms on Phishing URL Detection

Phishing attacks pose a significant threat to user’s data security by using counterfeit Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) that are hard to distinguish from legitimate ones. Machine learning can help identify phishing URLs by analyzing their features. This research work compares phishing detection mechanisms using Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Boosting techniques, evaluating their accuracy across five datasets. The datasets are: Dataset-1 (Kaggle, 2 class), Dataset-2 (UCI, 2 class), Dataset-3 (Mendeley, 2 class), Dataset-4 (UNB, 5 class) and Dataset-5 (Kaggle, 4 class). The analysis shows that boosting techniques outperform traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning, achieving detection accuracies of $\mathbf{9 7 \%, 9 6 \%, 9 8 \%, 9 8 \%}$ and 92% across the five datasets respectively.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvmi61877.2024.10782525
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Boosting Algorithms on Phishing URL Detection

V. Umadevi, Alaknanda Ashok, R Raghavendra, Dhiksha Rathis
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Boosting Algorithms on Phishing URL Detection

V. Umadevi, Alaknanda Ashok, R Raghavendra, Dhiksha Rathis
article en

Abstract

Phishing attacks pose a significant threat to user’s data security by using counterfeit Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) that are hard to distinguish from legitimate ones. Machine learning can help identify phishing URLs by analyzing their features. This research work compares phishing detection mechanisms using Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Boosting techniques, evaluating their accuracy across five datasets. The datasets are: Dataset-1 (Kaggle, 2 class), Dataset-2 (UCI, 2 class), Dataset-3 (Mendeley, 2 class), Dataset-4 (UNB, 5 class) and Dataset-5 (Kaggle, 4 class). The analysis shows that boosting techniques outperform traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning, achieving detection accuracies of $\mathbf{9 7 \%, 9 6 \%, 9 8 \%, 9 8 \%}$ and 92% across the five datasets respectively.

Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.