Slow burn: Re-examining the legacy of Conservative Party modernization

Abstract This article reconsiders the longer-term legacy of David Cameron’s attempts to ‘modernize’ the Conservative Party. In doing so, we aim to make three main contributions to existing scholarship. Firstly, whilst Cameron’s modernization project is judged to have been a failure by most scholars, we show that Conservative leaders post-Cameron have continued a process of party adaptation that exhibits striking continuities with many of its key elements. Secondly, whilst these developments have co-existed alongside a ratcheting up of seemingly ‘anti-modernizing’ populist and nationalist rhetoric, we contend that such moves show important continuities with Cameron’s own attempts to balance modernization with gestures towards Thatcherite politics. Thirdly, we offer a re-conceptualization of Conservative Party modernization as a fluid and contingent aspect of Conservative Party statecraft marked by an oscillation between, and sometimes a fusing of, modernizing rhetoric with more traditional Tory appeals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Slow burn: Re-examining the legacy of Conservative Party modernization

Nathan Critch, Peter Kerr, Steven Kettell
1 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Political and Economic history of UK and US
2.23
article

Slow burn: Re-examining the legacy of Conservative Party modernization

Nathan Critch, Peter Kerr, Steven Kettell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reconsiders the longer-term legacy of David Cameron’s attempts to ‘modernize’ the Conservative Party. In doing so, we aim to make three main contributions to existing scholarship. Firstly, whilst Cameron’s modernization project is judged to have been a failure by most scholars, we show that Conservative leaders post-Cameron have continued a process of party adaptation that exhibits striking continuities with many of its key elements. Secondly, whilst these developments have co-existed alongside a ratcheting up of seemingly ‘anti-modernizing’ populist and nationalist rhetoric, we contend that such moves show important continuities with Cameron’s own attempts to balance modernization with gestures towards Thatcherite politics. Thirdly, we offer a re-conceptualization of Conservative Party modernization as a fluid and contingent aspect of Conservative Party statecraft marked by an oscillation between, and sometimes a fusing of, modernizing rhetoric with more traditional Tory appeals.

Parliamentary Affairs
University of Manchester (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Strong
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Political and Economic history of UK and US
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Slow burn: Re-examining the legacy of Conservative Party modernization — Nathan Critch, Peter Kerr, et al. · Parliamentary Affairs (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS