Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri

Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users. One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes. Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs. Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100511
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri

Ellen Barnidge, Ally Terhaar, M. Somheil, H. Bednarek
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri

Ellen Barnidge, Ally Terhaar, M. Somheil, H. Bednarek
article en

Abstract

Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users. One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes. Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs. Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 7
Saint Louis University (US)
Missouri Foundation for Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.