Teaching Formal Charges of Lewis Electron Dot Structures by Counting Attachments

A method of assigning formal charges from counting “attachments” for visual inspection is introduced as part of the iterative portion of constructing Lewis electron dot structures. An “attachment” is either a “line” for a bond or a “dot” for a single electron, which is compared against the number of valence electrons, as indicated by group number. While formal charges are assigned for formality only, they are a useful tool to rationalize the more likely Lewis structure, especially when considering relative electronegativity differences among the elements. This method describes how changing the number of attachments around an atom in the Lewis electron dot structure fosters facile pattern recognition. The “attachment method” removes the accounting of numbers in categorizing electrons of “nonbonding” vs “bonding” in the more prevalent mathematical equation and may be useful for teaching introductory general chemistry. Various examples are described in contrasting the traditional mathematical approach and this “attachment method”. The goal is to provide another means for teaching formal charges, especially to reach students with various learning preferences. In surveying 426 students in a general chemistry course, a majority prefers the attachment method, and this group reports a statistically modest gain in performance on the corresponding in-class assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00579
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Formal Charges of Lewis Electron Dot Structures by Counting Attachments

Bryan Enderle, Joyce Pham, David Flórez Murillo
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Various Chemistry Research Topics
0.44
article

Teaching Formal Charges of Lewis Electron Dot Structures by Counting Attachments

Bryan Enderle, Joyce Pham, David Flórez Murillo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A method of assigning formal charges from counting “attachments” for visual inspection is introduced as part of the iterative portion of constructing Lewis electron dot structures. An “attachment” is either a “line” for a bond or a “dot” for a single electron, which is compared against the number of valence electrons, as indicated by group number. While formal charges are assigned for formality only, they are a useful tool to rationalize the more likely Lewis structure, especially when considering relative electronegativity differences among the elements. This method describes how changing the number of attachments around an atom in the Lewis electron dot structure fosters facile pattern recognition. The “attachment method” removes the accounting of numbers in categorizing electrons of “nonbonding” vs “bonding” in the more prevalent mathematical equation and may be useful for teaching introductory general chemistry. Various examples are described in contrasting the traditional mathematical approach and this “attachment method”. The goal is to provide another means for teaching formal charges, especially to reach students with various learning preferences. In surveying 426 students in a general chemistry course, a majority prefers the attachment method, and this group reports a statistically modest gain in performance on the corresponding in-class assessment.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 102(1)
California State University, San Bernardino (US), University of California, Davis (US)
U.S. Department of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.