BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND MIGRANT RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

This article examines the complex intersection between national security and migrant rights within the framework of international law. With an increasing focus on security, many states have adopted policies that restrict migration, often infringing on human rights, particularly the rights of asylum seekers and refugees. Using data from various regions, including the United States, Europe, and Australia, the article analyzes the impact of securitization on migration policies, such as reduced asylum approval rates, the rise in migrant detentions, and violations of the non-refoulement principle. The research highlights the challenges in balancing state security with the protection of migrants, emphasizing the role of international organizations and legal frameworks in addressing these issues. The article concludes that while national security concerns are valid, states must uphold their international obligations to protect migrant rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economic Integration and Regional Competitiveness
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61796/ijeirc.v1i9.214
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND MIGRANT RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Khakberdiev Mukhammad
International Journal of Economic Integration and Regional Competitiveness
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND MIGRANT RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Khakberdiev Mukhammad
article en

Abstract

This article examines the complex intersection between national security and migrant rights within the framework of international law. With an increasing focus on security, many states have adopted policies that restrict migration, often infringing on human rights, particularly the rights of asylum seekers and refugees. Using data from various regions, including the United States, Europe, and Australia, the article analyzes the impact of securitization on migration policies, such as reduced asylum approval rates, the rise in migrant detentions, and violations of the non-refoulement principle. The research highlights the challenges in balancing state security with the protection of migrants, emphasizing the role of international organizations and legal frameworks in addressing these issues. The article concludes that while national security concerns are valid, states must uphold their international obligations to protect migrant rights.

International Journal of Economic Integration and Regional CompetitivenessVol. 1(9)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND MIGRANT RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW — Khakberdiev Mukhammad · International Journal of Economic Integration and Regional Competitiveness (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS