Youth experiences in gender–sexuality alliances predict academic engagement but not disaffection through social–emotional wellbeing

Experiences in gender-sexuality alliances (GSAs) could predict youth's academic engagement through improved social-emotional wellbeing (indicated by school belonging, hope, and positive and negative affect). This study utilized three waves of data, each spaced 2-3 months apart, among 627 youth (87% LGBQ+, 45% trans/nonbinary, 48% youth of color) ages 11-22 (M<sub>age</sub> = 15.13) in 51 GSAs in the United States in 2021-2022. Greater peer responsiveness in the GSA predicted increased academic engagement through increased wellbeing overall and specifically through hope and decreased negative affect. Advisor responsiveness and GSA leadership correlated with wellbeing and academic engagement in bivariate analyses but were not predictive in the comprehensive model. GSA experiences were uncorrelated with academic disaffection. Findings suggest how GSAs promote youth's wellbeing and academic engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14209
Primary Topic
Youth Development and Social Support
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Youth experiences in gender–sexuality alliances predict academic engagement but not disaffection through social–emotional wellbeing

Abigail Richburg, V. Paul Poteat, Daniel Kellogg, Robert A. Marx et al.
Child Development
Youth Development and Social Support
article

Youth experiences in gender–sexuality alliances predict academic engagement but not disaffection through social–emotional wellbeing

Abigail Richburg, V. Paul Poteat, Daniel Kellogg, Robert A. Marx, Jerel P. Calzo, Arthur Lipkin, Hirokazu Yoshikawa
article en

Abstract

Experiences in gender-sexuality alliances (GSAs) could predict youth's academic engagement through improved social-emotional wellbeing (indicated by school belonging, hope, and positive and negative affect). This study utilized three waves of data, each spaced 2-3 months apart, among 627 youth (87% LGBQ+, 45% trans/nonbinary, 48% youth of color) ages 11-22 (M<sub>age</sub> = 15.13) in 51 GSAs in the United States in 2021-2022. Greater peer responsiveness in the GSA predicted increased academic engagement through increased wellbeing overall and specifically through hope and decreased negative affect. Advisor responsiveness and GSA leadership correlated with wellbeing and academic engagement in bivariate analyses but were not predictive in the comprehensive model. GSA experiences were uncorrelated with academic disaffection. Findings suggest how GSAs promote youth's wellbeing and academic engagement.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(2)
Boston College (US), San Diego State University (US), Dimagi (United States) (US), Cambridge College (US), San Jose State University (US), New York University (US)
Institute of Education Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Youth Development and Social Support
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Youth experiences in gender–sexuality alliances predict academic engagement but not disaffection through social–emotional wellbeing — Abigail Richburg, V. Paul Poteat, et al. · Child Development (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS