Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions

This mixed-methods study explores Embodied Resources (ERs) in an online, triadic task involving 52 candidates within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B2˗C1 range of language proficiency. Mean comparisons and correlations were used to explore the relationship between ER use and proficiency level. An applied Conversation Analysis approach was used to explicate specific sequences of conversational repair where ERs were evident. Findings suggest no significant correlation between proficiency and ER frequency but support the view that ERs are co-ordinated with verbal resources. This raises questions as to how language testers might approach the interplay of ERs and interactional practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classroom Discourse
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2408421
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions

Nicholas Glasson, Katherine Halley
1 citations
Classroom Discourse
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
2.78
article

Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions

Nicholas Glasson, Katherine Halley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This mixed-methods study explores Embodied Resources (ERs) in an online, triadic task involving 52 candidates within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) B2˗C1 range of language proficiency. Mean comparisons and correlations were used to explore the relationship between ER use and proficiency level. An applied Conversation Analysis approach was used to explicate specific sequences of conversational repair where ERs were evident. Findings suggest no significant correlation between proficiency and ER frequency but support the view that ERs are co-ordinated with verbal resources. This raises questions as to how language testers might approach the interplay of ERs and interactional practices.

Classroom DiscourseVol. 16(3)
University of Bedfordshire (GB), Cambridge University Press (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions — Nicholas Glasson, Katherine Halley · Classroom Discourse (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS