A Kick in the Headwaters: Evaluating a Macroinvertebrate Sampling Method for Ecological Condition Monitoring in Small Streams

ABSTRACT Small streams dominate river networks and collectively support high biodiversity, but are rarely included in regulatory biomonitoring programmes. Macroinvertebrate communities are effective biomonitors of ecological condition and are routinely collected using 3‐min ‘kick’ samples. However, this 3‐min duration may not be suitable for small streams, which typically support fewer taxa at lower densities than larger rivers of equivalent condition. We evaluated the kick‐sampling method at 30 sites representing a national small stream monitoring network. At each site, we collected three 5‐min kick samples in 10 0.5‐min component parts. We used the families collected in 15 min to represent ‘total’ site‐scale taxonomic richness, then determined the duration needed to sample ≥ 65% of these taxa (a method and target comparable to those used in larger rivers). We also determined the sampling duration at which an average score per taxon (ASPT) biomonitoring index stabilized. Considering all streams, on average, 2.5‐min durations captured ≥ 65% of taxa, but 3.5 min was required to reach this target in temporary streams, because numerous taxa occurred at low abundance. Only 54% of samples contained ≥ 65% of taxa after 2.5 min, compared to 70% after 3 min. In most streams, the ASPT stabilized after 2 min, whereas 3 min was required to meet this target in temporary streams. Considering the variation around any estimate of capture rates introduced by natural variability, taxonomic resolution and operator error, we suggest 3 min as the most robust sampling duration to enable condition monitoring in individual small streams and comparison with larger rivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
River Research and Applications
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4405
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Kick in the Headwaters: Evaluating a Macroinvertebrate Sampling Method for Ecological Condition Monitoring in Small Streams

LE Rippon, J. Iwan Jones, Mary Kelly‐Quinn, Paul Bates et al.
2 citations
River Research and Applications
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
0.92
article

A Kick in the Headwaters: Evaluating a Macroinvertebrate Sampling Method for Ecological Condition Monitoring in Small Streams

LE Rippon, J. Iwan Jones, Mary Kelly‐Quinn, Paul Bates, Alex Laini, Romain Sarremejane, Kieran J. Gething, Rachel Stubbington, John Murray‐Bligh, Simon Rouen, Oliver Longstaffe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Small streams dominate river networks and collectively support high biodiversity, but are rarely included in regulatory biomonitoring programmes. Macroinvertebrate communities are effective biomonitors of ecological condition and are routinely collected using 3‐min ‘kick’ samples. However, this 3‐min duration may not be suitable for small streams, which typically support fewer taxa at lower densities than larger rivers of equivalent condition. We evaluated the kick‐sampling method at 30 sites representing a national small stream monitoring network. At each site, we collected three 5‐min kick samples in 10 0.5‐min component parts. We used the families collected in 15 min to represent ‘total’ site‐scale taxonomic richness, then determined the duration needed to sample ≥ 65% of these taxa (a method and target comparable to those used in larger rivers). We also determined the sampling duration at which an average score per taxon (ASPT) biomonitoring index stabilized. Considering all streams, on average, 2.5‐min durations captured ≥ 65% of taxa, but 3.5 min was required to reach this target in temporary streams, because numerous taxa occurred at low abundance. Only 54% of samples contained ≥ 65% of taxa after 2.5 min, compared to 70% after 3 min. In most streams, the ASPT stabilized after 2 min, whereas 3 min was required to meet this target in temporary streams. Considering the variation around any estimate of capture rates introduced by natural variability, taxonomic resolution and operator error, we suggest 3 min as the most robust sampling duration to enable condition monitoring in individual small streams and comparison with larger rivers.

River Research and ApplicationsVol. 41(4)
University College Dublin (IE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Environment Agency (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB), University of Turin (IT)
Nottingham Trent University, Environment Agency, Trent University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.