Enhancing the assessment of in situ beam–column strength through probing and machine learning

Beam–columns are designed to withstand the concurrent action of both axial and bending stresses. Therefore, when assessing the structural health of an in situ beam–column, both of these load effects must be considered. Probing, having been shown recently to be an effective methodology for predicting the in situ health of prestressed stayed columns under axial compression, is applied currently for predicting the in situ health of beam–columns. Although probing stiffness was sufficient for predicting the health of prestressed stayed columns, additional data are required to predict both the moment and axial utilisation ratios. It is shown that the initial lateral deflection is a suitable measure considered alongside the probing stiffness measured at various probing locations within a revised machine learning (ML) framework. The inclusion of both terms in the ML framework produced an almost exact prediction of both the aforementioned utilisation ratios for various design combinations, thereby demonstrating that the probing framework proposed herein is an appropriate methodology for evaluating the structural strength reserves of beam–columns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1492235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the assessment of in situ beam–column strength through probing and machine learning

M. Ahmer Wadee, Luke Lapira, Jin Terng
1 citations
Frontiers in Built Environment
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.26
article

Enhancing the assessment of in situ beam–column strength through probing and machine learning

M. Ahmer Wadee, Luke Lapira, Jin Terng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Beam–columns are designed to withstand the concurrent action of both axial and bending stresses. Therefore, when assessing the structural health of an in situ beam–column, both of these load effects must be considered. Probing, having been shown recently to be an effective methodology for predicting the in situ health of prestressed stayed columns under axial compression, is applied currently for predicting the in situ health of beam–columns. Although probing stiffness was sufficient for predicting the health of prestressed stayed columns, additional data are required to predict both the moment and axial utilisation ratios. It is shown that the initial lateral deflection is a suitable measure considered alongside the probing stiffness measured at various probing locations within a revised machine learning (ML) framework. The inclusion of both terms in the ML framework produced an almost exact prediction of both the aforementioned utilisation ratios for various design combinations, thereby demonstrating that the probing framework proposed herein is an appropriate methodology for evaluating the structural strength reserves of beam–columns.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 10
University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing the assessment of in situ beam–column strength through probing and machine learning — M. Ahmer Wadee, Luke Lapira, et al. · Frontiers in Built Environment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS