Assessment of Masseter Muscle Hardness by Ultrasound Elastography and Hardness Meter in Healthy Individuals – An Observational Study

Abstract Background: Examining the masseter muscle is crucial in assessment of temporomandibular disorders, hypertrophy, and sports injuries. The study aims to assess the hardness of masseter muscle in normal adults by muscle hardness meter and ultrasound elastography. Methodology: Seventy healthy participants were included in the study. The thickness and muscle elasticity index (MEI) of masseter was conducted with the LOGIQ P9 machine by ultrasound elastography. A portable muscle hardness meter was utilized to quantify the stiffness of the masseter muscle. The data were subjected to statistical analysis. Paired sample t -test was used to compare the masseter muscle thickness with MEI. Pearson’s correlation was used to compare the masseter thickness, MEI, and muscle hardness meter values of masseter muscle. Results: The patients’ average age was 33.68 ± 12.68 years. The average values of muscle hardness meter are 0.80 ± 0.08 N and 0.79 ± 0.08 N, masseter thickness 1.03 ± 0.20 cm and 1.034 ± 0.26 cm, and MEI are 1.30 ± 0.30 and 1.32 ± 0.31, respectively, on right and left sides. The MEI values augmented with age bilaterally on both sides. Males had greater masseter muscle thickness in comparison to females. The comparison between hardness values of masseter obtained by hardness meter and MEI by ultrasound elastography and the masseter muscle thickness were assessed by Pearson’s correlation. Hardness meter and MEI association were 0.628, (moderately positive) with a P < 0.001. Conclusion: It was discovered that portable muscle hardness meters and ultrasound elastography are reliable indicators for determining the stiffness and thickness of the masseter muscle. This study provides reference values that can be used for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Journal of Clinical Anatomy
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/njca.njca_108_24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Masseter Muscle Hardness by Ultrasound Elastography and Hardness Meter in Healthy Individuals – An Observational Study

Rajesh Kumar Rathore, Ashutosh Patel, Deepa Jatti Patil
1 citations
National Journal of Clinical Anatomy
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
0.50
article

Assessment of Masseter Muscle Hardness by Ultrasound Elastography and Hardness Meter in Healthy Individuals – An Observational Study

Rajesh Kumar Rathore, Ashutosh Patel, Deepa Jatti Patil
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Examining the masseter muscle is crucial in assessment of temporomandibular disorders, hypertrophy, and sports injuries. The study aims to assess the hardness of masseter muscle in normal adults by muscle hardness meter and ultrasound elastography. Methodology: Seventy healthy participants were included in the study. The thickness and muscle elasticity index (MEI) of masseter was conducted with the LOGIQ P9 machine by ultrasound elastography. A portable muscle hardness meter was utilized to quantify the stiffness of the masseter muscle. The data were subjected to statistical analysis. Paired sample t -test was used to compare the masseter muscle thickness with MEI. Pearson’s correlation was used to compare the masseter thickness, MEI, and muscle hardness meter values of masseter muscle. Results: The patients’ average age was 33.68 ± 12.68 years. The average values of muscle hardness meter are 0.80 ± 0.08 N and 0.79 ± 0.08 N, masseter thickness 1.03 ± 0.20 cm and 1.034 ± 0.26 cm, and MEI are 1.30 ± 0.30 and 1.32 ± 0.31, respectively, on right and left sides. The MEI values augmented with age bilaterally on both sides. Males had greater masseter muscle thickness in comparison to females. The comparison between hardness values of masseter obtained by hardness meter and MEI by ultrasound elastography and the masseter muscle thickness were assessed by Pearson’s correlation. Hardness meter and MEI association were 0.628, (moderately positive) with a P < 0.001. Conclusion: It was discovered that portable muscle hardness meters and ultrasound elastography are reliable indicators for determining the stiffness and thickness of the masseter muscle. This study provides reference values that can be used for further research.

National Journal of Clinical AnatomyVol. 13(4)
KM Shah Dental College and Hospital (IN), Suamandeep Vidyapeeth University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.