Are Bilinguals More Creative Than Monolinguals? A Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT This study synthesizes quantitative research on the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. Extant literature underlines the role of developmental, cognitive, and socio‐cultural factors to explain the nature of the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. While decades of research frequently indicate a positive link, contrary or mixed evidence has also been documented, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of existing quantitative data to understand the direction and strength of this relationship. Additionally, identifying factors contributing to inconsistent outcomes is crucial. Thus, we estimated the mean effects and examined various potential sources of variation, including study and participant characteristics, as well as measurement and bilingualism‐related factors, to shed light into the heterogeneity. Addressing these objectives, we analyzed 312 effect sizes from 39 studies ( N = 4,917) and found a mean effect size of Pearson r = .181, 95% CI [.096, .263]. This finding shows that bilinguals are overall more creative than monolinguals. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the mean effects between test modality categories, with studies using numerical modality reporting significantly larger effect sizes compared to those using action/movement modality. We discuss the findings with research and practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1521
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Bilinguals More Creative Than Monolinguals? A Meta‐Analysis

Hatice Nur Ozcelik, Bhoj Balayar, Selçuk Acar, Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin
5 citations
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.54
article

Are Bilinguals More Creative Than Monolinguals? A Meta‐Analysis

Hatice Nur Ozcelik, Bhoj Balayar, Selçuk Acar, Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study synthesizes quantitative research on the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. Extant literature underlines the role of developmental, cognitive, and socio‐cultural factors to explain the nature of the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. While decades of research frequently indicate a positive link, contrary or mixed evidence has also been documented, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of existing quantitative data to understand the direction and strength of this relationship. Additionally, identifying factors contributing to inconsistent outcomes is crucial. Thus, we estimated the mean effects and examined various potential sources of variation, including study and participant characteristics, as well as measurement and bilingualism‐related factors, to shed light into the heterogeneity. Addressing these objectives, we analyzed 312 effect sizes from 39 studies ( N = 4,917) and found a mean effect size of Pearson r = .181, 95% CI [.096, .263]. This finding shows that bilinguals are overall more creative than monolinguals. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the mean effects between test modality categories, with studies using numerical modality reporting significantly larger effect sizes compared to those using action/movement modality. We discuss the findings with research and practical implications.

The Journal of Creative BehaviorVol. 58(4)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of North Texas (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.