The Subject: Challenges of the Digital

The article deals with the problem of the influence of digitalization processes on the concept of a subject. The purpose of the study is to analyze this influence and substantiate the possibility of preserving the category of the subject in the philosophical understanding of the present world and human being. It is shown that the expansion of human activity into the digital environment creates a situation in which the possibility of the existence of a subject as an integrity is questioned, since human activity is distributed across two environments — physical and digital. Several key problematic points are considered that make it necessary to clarify understanding of the subject in the modern world — these are the “disembodied” subject in the digital environment, the “decentralization” of the subject (i.e., the distribution of his activities in two different environments) and the alienation of information about the subject and messages belonging to it in the digital environment. It is revealed that at the heart of all these three problems, in one way or another, there is a gap between the bodily being of a person and its manifestations in the digital world, and it is demonstrated that the “incorporeality” of the subject in the digital world is illusory. It shows how a number of authors begin to use the concept of a “digital subject” to solve the above-mentioned problems and concludes that the use of such a term is possible only as a metaphor, since it hints at the existence of a certain separate entity in the digital world, whereas the subject cannot be considered in complete isolation from the physical environment. It is concluded that the distribution of human activity in the physical and digital environment is not the reason for the rejection of the concept of the subject. It is shown that the modern understanding of the subject is possible with a combination of approaches of body-oriented cognition and narrative approach, where the first is associated with the embodied being of the subject in the physical environment, and the second not only reflects the being of the subject in the digital environment, but also serves as a link between the digital and physical aspects of the subject. The combination of these two approaches allows us to preserve the idea of the integrity of the subject.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Galactica Media Journal of Media Studies
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i4.525
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Subject: Challenges of the Digital

Elena O. Trufanova
1 citations
Galactica Media Journal of Media Studies
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
0.78
article

The Subject: Challenges of the Digital

Elena O. Trufanova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of the influence of digitalization processes on the concept of a subject. The purpose of the study is to analyze this influence and substantiate the possibility of preserving the category of the subject in the philosophical understanding of the present world and human being. It is shown that the expansion of human activity into the digital environment creates a situation in which the possibility of the existence of a subject as an integrity is questioned, since human activity is distributed across two environments — physical and digital. Several key problematic points are considered that make it necessary to clarify understanding of the subject in the modern world — these are the “disembodied” subject in the digital environment, the “decentralization” of the subject (i.e., the distribution of his activities in two different environments) and the alienation of information about the subject and messages belonging to it in the digital environment. It is revealed that at the heart of all these three problems, in one way or another, there is a gap between the bodily being of a person and its manifestations in the digital world, and it is demonstrated that the “incorporeality” of the subject in the digital world is illusory. It shows how a number of authors begin to use the concept of a “digital subject” to solve the above-mentioned problems and concludes that the use of such a term is possible only as a metaphor, since it hints at the existence of a certain separate entity in the digital world, whereas the subject cannot be considered in complete isolation from the physical environment. It is concluded that the distribution of human activity in the physical and digital environment is not the reason for the rejection of the concept of the subject. It is shown that the modern understanding of the subject is possible with a combination of approaches of body-oriented cognition and narrative approach, where the first is associated with the embodied being of the subject in the physical environment, and the second not only reflects the being of the subject in the digital environment, but also serves as a link between the digital and physical aspects of the subject. The combination of these two approaches allows us to preserve the idea of the integrity of the subject.

Galactica Media Journal of Media StudiesVol. 6(4)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.