Porcine peritoneal macrophages are susceptible to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection

Previous studies have suggested that porcine peritoneal macrophages (PPMs) are resistant to PRRSV infection, whereas porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) are highly susceptible. This contrast is intriguing, as both cell types belong to the same monocyte/macrophage family. The current study aimed to investigate the host factors contributing to the differing susceptibility of PPMs and PAMs to PRRSV infection. We found that PPMs exhibit a higher frequency of CD14<sup>+</sup> cells compared to PAMs, suggesting a more immature macrophage phenotype in PPMs. Importantly, PPMs expressed both CD163 and CD169, the key receptors for PRRSV entry, although the frequency and intensity of CD163 and CD169 expression were lower in PPMs than in PAMs. Despite these differences, PPMs were susceptible to both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 isolates. Notably, PPMs susceptibility increased 10-fold when the cells were cultured for 1 day before infection. PRRSV infection in PPMs was dependent on CD163, as pretreatment with an anti-CD163 antibody significantly reduced infection. Overall, our results demonstrate that PPMs are susceptible to PRRSV infection, thereby expanding the understanding of PRRSV tropism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1505900
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Virus Infections Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Porcine peritoneal macrophages are susceptible to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection

Hiep L. X. Vu, Kassandra Durazo-Martínez, Jayeshbhai Chaudhari, Sushmita Kumari
1 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Animal Virus Infections Studies
0.34
article

Porcine peritoneal macrophages are susceptible to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection

Hiep L. X. Vu, Kassandra Durazo-Martínez, Jayeshbhai Chaudhari, Sushmita Kumari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that porcine peritoneal macrophages (PPMs) are resistant to PRRSV infection, whereas porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) are highly susceptible. This contrast is intriguing, as both cell types belong to the same monocyte/macrophage family. The current study aimed to investigate the host factors contributing to the differing susceptibility of PPMs and PAMs to PRRSV infection. We found that PPMs exhibit a higher frequency of CD14<sup>+</sup> cells compared to PAMs, suggesting a more immature macrophage phenotype in PPMs. Importantly, PPMs expressed both CD163 and CD169, the key receptors for PRRSV entry, although the frequency and intensity of CD163 and CD169 expression were lower in PPMs than in PAMs. Despite these differences, PPMs were susceptible to both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 isolates. Notably, PPMs susceptibility increased 10-fold when the cells were cultured for 1 day before infection. PRRSV infection in PPMs was dependent on CD163, as pretreatment with an anti-CD163 antibody significantly reduced infection. Overall, our results demonstrate that PPMs are susceptible to PRRSV infection, thereby expanding the understanding of PRRSV tropism.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 15
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Animal Virus Infections Studies
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.