Damage and failure analysis of twin tunnels with cross passages subjected to strike-slip faulting

• The cross passage leads to the tunnels being more vulnerable to faulting. • The cross passage is under compression and twisted during faulting. • Stress level and cross passage location affect the structure’s behaviors. Many transportation tunnels are twin tunnels with cross passages. Plenty of research has investigated the responses of a single tunnel under fault deformation. However, few studies have paid attention to the behaviors of twin tunnels with cross passages in the fault zones. The study conducts three-dimensional numerical modeling to analyze the damage and failure of twin tunnels with cross passages subjected to strike-slip faulting. The responses of twin tunnels with and without a cross passage are compared. Besides, some influence factors are discussed, such as lateral stress coefficient, location of the cross passage, and length of the cross passage. The results show that the cross passage has great effects on twin tunnels’ behaviors. The cross passage leads to the twin tunnels being more vulnerable to fault deformation. The connection section of tunnels and the cross passage rather than the fault plane sections is the most dangerous section, where both peak compressive and tensile damage are induced. The cross passage is under compression and twisted during faulting. A larger lateral stress coefficient leads to more severe damage to the tunnels and the cross passage. Both the tunnels and the cross passage become safer when the cross passage is located out of the fault. The length of the cross passage has limited effects on the behaviors of structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Failure Analysis
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109197
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Damage and failure analysis of twin tunnels with cross passages subjected to strike-slip faulting

Chaofan Yao, Wenbo Yang, Guowen Xu, Yulin Liu et al.
11 citations
Engineering Failure Analysis
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
2.87
article

Damage and failure analysis of twin tunnels with cross passages subjected to strike-slip faulting

Chaofan Yao, Wenbo Yang, Guowen Xu, Yulin Liu, Junchen Zhang, Chuan He, Wang Luo, Jingnan Duan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

• The cross passage leads to the tunnels being more vulnerable to faulting. • The cross passage is under compression and twisted during faulting. • Stress level and cross passage location affect the structure’s behaviors. Many transportation tunnels are twin tunnels with cross passages. Plenty of research has investigated the responses of a single tunnel under fault deformation. However, few studies have paid attention to the behaviors of twin tunnels with cross passages in the fault zones. The study conducts three-dimensional numerical modeling to analyze the damage and failure of twin tunnels with cross passages subjected to strike-slip faulting. The responses of twin tunnels with and without a cross passage are compared. Besides, some influence factors are discussed, such as lateral stress coefficient, location of the cross passage, and length of the cross passage. The results show that the cross passage has great effects on twin tunnels’ behaviors. The cross passage leads to the twin tunnels being more vulnerable to fault deformation. The connection section of tunnels and the cross passage rather than the fault plane sections is the most dangerous section, where both peak compressive and tensile damage are induced. The cross passage is under compression and twisted during faulting. A larger lateral stress coefficient leads to more severe damage to the tunnels and the cross passage. Both the tunnels and the cross passage become safer when the cross passage is located out of the fault. The length of the cross passage has limited effects on the behaviors of structures.

Engineering Failure AnalysisVol. 169
Shenzhen University (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.