Intensity-based stochastic model of terrestrial laser scanners: Methodological workflow, empirical derivation and practical benefit

After more than twenty years of commercial use, laser scanners have reached technical maturity and consequently became a standard tool for 3D-data acquisition across various fields of application. Yet, meaningful stochastic information regarding the achieved metric quality of recorded points remains an open research question. Recent research demonstrated that raw intensity values can be deployed to derive stochastic models for reflectorless rangefinders. Yet, all existing studies focused on single instances of particular laser scanners while the derivation of the stochastic models required significant efforts. Motivated by the aforementioned shortcomings, the focus of this study is set on the comparison of stochastic models for a series of eight identical phase-based scanners that differ in age, working hours and date of last calibration. In order to achieve this, a standardised methodological workflow is suggested to derive the unknown parameters of the individual stochastic models. Based on the generated outcome, a comparison is conducted which clarifies if a universally applicable stochastic model (type calibration) can be used for a particular scanner model or if individual parameter sets are still required for every scanner (instance calibration) to validate the practical benefit and usability of those models. The generated results successfully demonstrate that the computed stochastic model is transferable to all individual scanners of the series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophoto.2024.100079
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity-based stochastic model of terrestrial laser scanners: Methodological workflow, empirical derivation and practical benefit

Christoph Holst, Florian Schill, Daniel Wujanz, Jens‐André Paffenholz et al.
1 citations
ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
article

Intensity-based stochastic model of terrestrial laser scanners: Methodological workflow, empirical derivation and practical benefit

Christoph Holst, Florian Schill, Daniel Wujanz, Jens‐André Paffenholz, Jens Hartmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

After more than twenty years of commercial use, laser scanners have reached technical maturity and consequently became a standard tool for 3D-data acquisition across various fields of application. Yet, meaningful stochastic information regarding the achieved metric quality of recorded points remains an open research question. Recent research demonstrated that raw intensity values can be deployed to derive stochastic models for reflectorless rangefinders. Yet, all existing studies focused on single instances of particular laser scanners while the derivation of the stochastic models required significant efforts. Motivated by the aforementioned shortcomings, the focus of this study is set on the comparison of stochastic models for a series of eight identical phase-based scanners that differ in age, working hours and date of last calibration. In order to achieve this, a standardised methodological workflow is suggested to derive the unknown parameters of the individual stochastic models. Based on the generated outcome, a comparison is conducted which clarifies if a universally applicable stochastic model (type calibration) can be used for a particular scanner model or if individual parameter sets are still required for every scanner (instance calibration) to validate the practical benefit and usability of those models. The generated results successfully demonstrate that the computed stochastic model is transferable to all individual scanners of the series.

ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingVol. 15
Federal Foreign Office (DE), University of Applied Sciences Mainz (DE), Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Clausthal University of Technology (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.