Evaluation of the technical performance of the Nofence virtual fencing system in Alberta, Canada

• Network connectivity was optimal and virtual fence collar failures minimal while operating. • Solar charging varied between seasons, with no impact on battery charge or performance. • A limited number of collars were physically lost by cattle while grazing. • Technical performance was considered adequate in this northern temperate region. Virtual fence (VF) technology uses GPS-enabled collars to manage cattle movement through audio cues and electrical pulses, offering a potential alternative to traditional physical fencing. The performance of Nofence VF collars was evaluated while in operational mode and deployed on cattle grazing within the northern temperate climate of central Alberta, Canada. Technical parameters such as network connectivity, collar failures, battery performance, and solar charging capabilities of the VF collars were evaluated across four grazing trials, three conducted in summer and one in winter. The network connection intervals, defined as the time between successive connection events, ranged from 8.1 (± 6.2) to 9.4 (± 5.4) minutes throughout the trials, remaining well within the optimal 15-minute interval, highlighting the favourable interactivity with end-users. Poor network connections occurred less than 1 % of the time, demonstrating robust coverage across the entire area. Fourteen collars experienced a network connection failure that did not persist after a manual reset. Four cattle physically lost their collars, which were then recovered and promptly redeployed. Although the mean solar charging rate was lower during the winter trial (3.1 ± 10.8 mA h -1 ) than the summer trials (7.9 ± 18.0 to 12.4 ± 22.1 mA h -1 ), mean battery charge remained greater than 96 % for all trials, even during winter when daylight was limited. While reliable cellular network access is crucial, these results indicate that Nofence VF collars can effectively function in diverse environmental conditions, and may be suitable for broader adoption by cattle producers grazing in relatively cold climates, including those of western Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100713
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the technical performance of the Nofence virtual fencing system in Alberta, Canada

Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Francisco José de Novais, Edward William Bork, Alexandra J. Harland et al.
5 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
1.30
article

Evaluation of the technical performance of the Nofence virtual fencing system in Alberta, Canada

Carolyn Fitzsimmons, Francisco José de Novais, Edward William Bork, Alexandra J. Harland, Obioha N. Durunna, John S. Church
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Network connectivity was optimal and virtual fence collar failures minimal while operating. • Solar charging varied between seasons, with no impact on battery charge or performance. • A limited number of collars were physically lost by cattle while grazing. • Technical performance was considered adequate in this northern temperate region. Virtual fence (VF) technology uses GPS-enabled collars to manage cattle movement through audio cues and electrical pulses, offering a potential alternative to traditional physical fencing. The performance of Nofence VF collars was evaluated while in operational mode and deployed on cattle grazing within the northern temperate climate of central Alberta, Canada. Technical parameters such as network connectivity, collar failures, battery performance, and solar charging capabilities of the VF collars were evaluated across four grazing trials, three conducted in summer and one in winter. The network connection intervals, defined as the time between successive connection events, ranged from 8.1 (± 6.2) to 9.4 (± 5.4) minutes throughout the trials, remaining well within the optimal 15-minute interval, highlighting the favourable interactivity with end-users. Poor network connections occurred less than 1 % of the time, demonstrating robust coverage across the entire area. Fourteen collars experienced a network connection failure that did not persist after a manual reset. Four cattle physically lost their collars, which were then recovered and promptly redeployed. Although the mean solar charging rate was lower during the winter trial (3.1 ± 10.8 mA h -1 ) than the summer trials (7.9 ± 18.0 to 12.4 ± 22.1 mA h -1 ), mean battery charge remained greater than 96 % for all trials, even during winter when daylight was limited. While reliable cellular network access is crucial, these results indicate that Nofence VF collars can effectively function in diverse environmental conditions, and may be suitable for broader adoption by cattle producers grazing in relatively cold climates, including those of western Canada.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 10
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Thompson Rivers University (CA), Lakeland College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.