A Protocol Mechanism for Solving the “Right” Strategic Problem

Solving the wrong strategic problem, sometimes referred to as a Type III error, is a common and costly occurrence in organizations. Unfortunately, little research offers theory-based mechanisms for reducing the likelihood of Type III errors, which is a canonical strategic management problem. In response, this article develops a novel theoretical framework drawing on multiple disciplines to hypothesize when Type III errors are likely to occur in strategic contexts. It develops three criteria derived from our hypotheses to normatively design a protocol mechanism to reduce the likelihood of Type III errors. We then offer a protocol that satisfies these conditions and provide a case study to illuminate how to employ the protocol as well as illustrate its potential for reducing Type III errors. In sum, this article offers the first theoretical assessment of individual-level impediments to “solving the right strategic problem” as well as a mechanism and associated conditions for future theoretical and empirical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Review
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000070
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Protocol Mechanism for Solving the “Right” Strategic Problem

Trey Cummings, Jackson A. Nickerson
4 citations
Strategic Management Review
Global Energy Security and Policy
1.76
article

A Protocol Mechanism for Solving the “Right” Strategic Problem

Trey Cummings, Jackson A. Nickerson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Solving the wrong strategic problem, sometimes referred to as a Type III error, is a common and costly occurrence in organizations. Unfortunately, little research offers theory-based mechanisms for reducing the likelihood of Type III errors, which is a canonical strategic management problem. In response, this article develops a novel theoretical framework drawing on multiple disciplines to hypothesize when Type III errors are likely to occur in strategic contexts. It develops three criteria derived from our hypotheses to normatively design a protocol mechanism to reduce the likelihood of Type III errors. We then offer a protocol that satisfies these conditions and provide a case study to illuminate how to employ the protocol as well as illustrate its potential for reducing Type III errors. In sum, this article offers the first theoretical assessment of individual-level impediments to “solving the right strategic problem” as well as a mechanism and associated conditions for future theoretical and empirical research.

Strategic Management ReviewVol. 5(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Energy Security and Policy
1.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.