Specific Recommendations for the Evaluation of Orphan Drugs in Spain: The EvalRare project

Introduction and Objective: Rare diseases (RDs) are low-prevalence conditions that significantly impact patients’ lives, often requiring orphan drugs (ODs) for treatment. This study aims to establish a national framework for assessing the quality of clinical evidence for ODs in Spain, to better manage associated uncertainties and support informed decision-making by stakeholders. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study using focus group methodology was carried out. A review was conducted to identify evaluation criteria from Therapeutic Positioning Reports (TPRs) by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) and the GENESIS group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH). A multidisciplinary focus group of experts from national, regional, and hospital levels discussed and refined these criteria, proposing new variables and reaching consensus on final recommendations. Results: Key evaluation criteria were identified, including study design, comparison type, primary clinical endpoints, study population, and study duration. Recommendations were categorized by acceptability, addressing the specific challenges in OD development. While randomized clinical trials remain the gold standard, alternative designs, such as uncontrolled non-randomized cohort studies, may be acceptable under certain conditions, particularly when there is a significant unmet medical need and no alternative therapies. Both clinical endpoints and validated quality of life metrics are crucial in assessing ODs. Smaller sample sizes and shorter study durations may be acceptable if justified by the disease’s characteristics and the clinical relevance of the outcomes. Conclusion: The proposed framework offers a tailored guide for evaluating the clinical evidence of ODs, providing recommendations that may enhance decision-making by stakeholders for determining patient access to OD treatments. Key words: orphan drugs, evaluation, research methodology, health decision-making, recommendations, rare diseases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economía de la Salud
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61679/1905045054
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specific Recommendations for the Evaluation of Orphan Drugs in Spain: The EvalRare project

Xavier Badía, Manel Fontanet, Laura Gutiérrez, Daniel‐Anibal Garcia Diego et al.
1 citations
Economía de la Salud
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
article

Specific Recommendations for the Evaluation of Orphan Drugs in Spain: The EvalRare project

Xavier Badía, Manel Fontanet, Laura Gutiérrez, Daniel‐Anibal Garcia Diego, María Reyes Abad Sazatornil, Encarna Guillén‐Navarro, Elena Casaus, José Luís Poveda, Antonio Vallano, J. Shepherd, Miguel Ángel Calleja
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Rare diseases (RDs) are low-prevalence conditions that significantly impact patients’ lives, often requiring orphan drugs (ODs) for treatment. This study aims to establish a national framework for assessing the quality of clinical evidence for ODs in Spain, to better manage associated uncertainties and support informed decision-making by stakeholders. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study using focus group methodology was carried out. A review was conducted to identify evaluation criteria from Therapeutic Positioning Reports (TPRs) by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) and the GENESIS group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH). A multidisciplinary focus group of experts from national, regional, and hospital levels discussed and refined these criteria, proposing new variables and reaching consensus on final recommendations. Results: Key evaluation criteria were identified, including study design, comparison type, primary clinical endpoints, study population, and study duration. Recommendations were categorized by acceptability, addressing the specific challenges in OD development. While randomized clinical trials remain the gold standard, alternative designs, such as uncontrolled non-randomized cohort studies, may be acceptable under certain conditions, particularly when there is a significant unmet medical need and no alternative therapies. Both clinical endpoints and validated quality of life metrics are crucial in assessing ODs. Smaller sample sizes and shorter study durations may be acceptable if justified by the disease’s characteristics and the clinical relevance of the outcomes. Conclusion: The proposed framework offers a tailored guide for evaluating the clinical evidence of ODs, providing recommendations that may enhance decision-making by stakeholders for determining patient access to OD treatments. Key words: orphan drugs, evaluation, research methodology, health decision-making, recommendations, rare diseases.

Economía de la SaludVol. 19
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.