Alternative Design Approach Addressing High Shear Demands in Rock Sockets

It is a common strategy to “socket” drilled shafts into rock to develop lateral or axial capacity where overburden soils are shallow and/or relatively weak compared with the underlying rock formation. Methods of numerically modeling soil-structure interaction using discrete, nonlinear springs representing soil response as a function of pile discplacement (p-y methods) demonstrate shear forces near the top of the rock sockets that are significantly larger than the applied forces to the drilled shaft. The amplification effect has been shown to decrease with decreasing rock quality. The ensuing shear forces can often significantly exceed the structural capacity of rock sockets as calculated using traditional sectional methods with practical reinforcing ratios. Considering the mechanics and geometric characteristics of load transfer through the rock socket into the supporting geomaterial, it is apparent these elements should be characterized as D-regions for which an STM approach is an appropriate tool for assessing the rock socket structural capacity. Such an approach has been demonstrated to yield drilled shaft and rock socket sections that are more economical and constructable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241292581
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative Design Approach Addressing High Shear Demands in Rock Sockets

Lawrence E. Rolwes, David J. Bennier
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Alternative Design Approach Addressing High Shear Demands in Rock Sockets

Lawrence E. Rolwes, David J. Bennier
article en

Abstract

It is a common strategy to “socket” drilled shafts into rock to develop lateral or axial capacity where overburden soils are shallow and/or relatively weak compared with the underlying rock formation. Methods of numerically modeling soil-structure interaction using discrete, nonlinear springs representing soil response as a function of pile discplacement (p-y methods) demonstrate shear forces near the top of the rock sockets that are significantly larger than the applied forces to the drilled shaft. The amplification effect has been shown to decrease with decreasing rock quality. The ensuing shear forces can often significantly exceed the structural capacity of rock sockets as calculated using traditional sectional methods with practical reinforcing ratios. Considering the mechanics and geometric characteristics of load transfer through the rock socket into the supporting geomaterial, it is apparent these elements should be characterized as D-regions for which an STM approach is an appropriate tool for assessing the rock socket structural capacity. Such an approach has been demonstrated to yield drilled shaft and rock socket sections that are more economical and constructable.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardVol. 2679(5)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Alternative Design Approach Addressing High Shear Demands in Rock Sockets — Lawrence E. Rolwes, David J. Bennier · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS