How Do Scientists Think? Contributions Toward a Cognitive Science of Science

Scientific thinking is one of the most creative expressions of human cognition. This paper discusses my research contributions to the cognitive science of science. I have advanced the position that data on the cognitive practices of scientists drawn from extensive research into archival records of historical science or collected in extended ethnographic studies of contemporary science can provide valuable insight into the nature of scientific cognition and its relation to cognition in ordinary contexts. I focus on contributions of my research on analogy, model-based reasoning, and conceptual change and on how scientists enhance their natural cognitive capacities by creating modeling environments that integrate cognitive, social, material, and cultural resources. I provide an outline of my trajectory from a physicist to a philosopher of science to a hybrid cognitive scientist in my quest to understand the nature of scientific thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topics in Cognitive Science
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12777
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Scientists Think? Contributions Toward a Cognitive Science of Science

Nancy J. Nersessian
7 citations
Topics in Cognitive Science
Philosophy and History of Science
42.30
article

How Do Scientists Think? Contributions Toward a Cognitive Science of Science

Nancy J. Nersessian
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Scientific thinking is one of the most creative expressions of human cognition. This paper discusses my research contributions to the cognitive science of science. I have advanced the position that data on the cognitive practices of scientists drawn from extensive research into archival records of historical science or collected in extended ethnographic studies of contemporary science can provide valuable insight into the nature of scientific cognition and its relation to cognition in ordinary contexts. I focus on contributions of my research on analogy, model-based reasoning, and conceptual change and on how scientists enhance their natural cognitive capacities by creating modeling environments that integrate cognitive, social, material, and cultural resources. I provide an outline of my trajectory from a physicist to a philosopher of science to a hybrid cognitive scientist in my quest to understand the nature of scientific thinking.

Topics in Cognitive ScienceVol. 17(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Harvard University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Philosophy and History of Science
42.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Do Scientists Think? Contributions Toward a Cognitive Science of Science — Nancy J. Nersessian · Topics in Cognitive Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS