Comparison of Untargeted and Markers Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds with SIFT-MS and SPME-GC-MS to Assess Tea Traceability

Tea is one of the most consumed beverages in the world and presents a great aromatic diversity depending on the origin of the production and the transformation process. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) greatly contribute to the sensory perception of tea and are excellent markers for traceability and quality. In this work, we analyzed the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by twenty-six perfectly traced samples of tea with two analytical techniques and two data treatment strategies. First, we performed headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) as the most widely used reference method for sanitary and quality controls of food. Next, we analyzed the samples with selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS), an emerging method for direct analysis of food products and aroma. We compared the performances of both techniques to trace the origin and the transformation processes. We selected the forty-eight most relevant markers with HS-SPME-GC-MS and evaluated their concentrations with a flame ionization detector (FID) on the same instrument. This set of markers permitted separation of the origins of samples but did not allow the samples to be differentiated based on the color. The same set of markers was measured with SIFT-MS instrument without success for either origin separation or color differentiation. Finally, a post-processing treatment of raw data signals with an untargeted approach was applied to the GC-MS and SIFT-MS dataset. This strategy allowed a good discrimination of origin and color with both instruments. Advantages and drawbacks of volatile profiles with both instruments were discussed for the traceability and quality assessment of food.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13243996
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Untargeted and Markers Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds with SIFT-MS and SPME-GC-MS to Assess Tea Traceability

Marine Reyrolle, Lydia Gautier, Valérie Desauziers, Mickael Le Béchec et al.
5 citations
Foods
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.92
article

Comparison of Untargeted and Markers Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds with SIFT-MS and SPME-GC-MS to Assess Tea Traceability

Marine Reyrolle, Lydia Gautier, Valérie Desauziers, Mickael Le Béchec, Thierry Pigot
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tea is one of the most consumed beverages in the world and presents a great aromatic diversity depending on the origin of the production and the transformation process. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) greatly contribute to the sensory perception of tea and are excellent markers for traceability and quality. In this work, we analyzed the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by twenty-six perfectly traced samples of tea with two analytical techniques and two data treatment strategies. First, we performed headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) as the most widely used reference method for sanitary and quality controls of food. Next, we analyzed the samples with selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS), an emerging method for direct analysis of food products and aroma. We compared the performances of both techniques to trace the origin and the transformation processes. We selected the forty-eight most relevant markers with HS-SPME-GC-MS and evaluated their concentrations with a flame ionization detector (FID) on the same instrument. This set of markers permitted separation of the origins of samples but did not allow the samples to be differentiated based on the color. The same set of markers was measured with SIFT-MS instrument without success for either origin separation or color differentiation. Finally, a post-processing treatment of raw data signals with an untargeted approach was applied to the GC-MS and SIFT-MS dataset. This strategy allowed a good discrimination of origin and color with both instruments. Advantages and drawbacks of volatile profiles with both instruments were discussed for the traceability and quality assessment of food.

FoodsVol. 13(24)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico-Chimie pour l'Environnement et les Matériaux (FR), IMT Mines Alès (FR)
Conseil Régional Aquitaine
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.