Performance Optimization of 5G–Satellite Integrated Networks for IoT Applications in Smart Cities: A Two-Ray Propagation Model Approach

The convergence of 5G terrestrial networks with satellite systems offers a revolutionary approach to achieving global, seamless connectivity, particularly for Internet of Things (IoT) applications in urban and rural settings. This paper investigates the implications of this 5G–satellite integrated network architecture, specifically through the application of the two-ray propagation model and the free-space path loss (FSPL) model. By simulating signal characteristics over varying distances, altitudes, and environmental parameters, we explore how factors such as transmitter height, satellite altitude, and frequency impact received power, path loss, channel capacity, and outage probability. The key findings indicate that received power decreases significantly with increasing distance, with notable oscillations in the two-ray model due to interference from ground reflections, particularly evident within the first 100 km. For example, at 50 km, a 300 km satellite altitude yields approximately −115 dBm in received power, while at 1000 km altitude, this power drops to around −136 dBm. Higher frequencies (e.g., 32 GHz) exhibit greater path loss than lower frequencies (e.g., 24 GHz), with a 5 dB difference observed at 1000 km, reinforcing the need for frequency considerations in long-range communication design. In terms of channel capacity, increasing bandwidth enhances achievable data rates but declines with distance due to diminishing received power. At 100 km, a 50 MHz bandwidth supports up to 4500 Mbps, while at 3000 km, capacity drops to around 300 Mbps. The outage probability analysis shows that higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thresholds substantially increase the likelihood of communication failures, especially at distances exceeding 2000 km. For instance, at 3000 km, the outage probability for a 15 dB SNR threshold reaches approximately 25%, compared to less than 5% for a 5 dB threshold. These results underscore the critical trade-offs in designing 5G–satellite IoT networks, balancing bandwidth, frequency, SNR thresholds, and satellite altitudes for optimal performance across diverse IoT applications. The analysis provides valuable insights for enhancing connectivity and reliability in 5G–satellite integrated networks, especially in remote and underserved regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Cities
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060150
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Satellite Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Optimization of 5G–Satellite Integrated Networks for IoT Applications in Smart Cities: A Two-Ray Propagation Model Approach

Sunday Ekpo, Mfonobong Uko, Sunday Enahoro, Fanuel Elias
8 citations
Smart Cities
Satellite Communication Systems
10.39
article

Performance Optimization of 5G–Satellite Integrated Networks for IoT Applications in Smart Cities: A Two-Ray Propagation Model Approach

Sunday Ekpo, Mfonobong Uko, Sunday Enahoro, Fanuel Elias
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The convergence of 5G terrestrial networks with satellite systems offers a revolutionary approach to achieving global, seamless connectivity, particularly for Internet of Things (IoT) applications in urban and rural settings. This paper investigates the implications of this 5G–satellite integrated network architecture, specifically through the application of the two-ray propagation model and the free-space path loss (FSPL) model. By simulating signal characteristics over varying distances, altitudes, and environmental parameters, we explore how factors such as transmitter height, satellite altitude, and frequency impact received power, path loss, channel capacity, and outage probability. The key findings indicate that received power decreases significantly with increasing distance, with notable oscillations in the two-ray model due to interference from ground reflections, particularly evident within the first 100 km. For example, at 50 km, a 300 km satellite altitude yields approximately −115 dBm in received power, while at 1000 km altitude, this power drops to around −136 dBm. Higher frequencies (e.g., 32 GHz) exhibit greater path loss than lower frequencies (e.g., 24 GHz), with a 5 dB difference observed at 1000 km, reinforcing the need for frequency considerations in long-range communication design. In terms of channel capacity, increasing bandwidth enhances achievable data rates but declines with distance due to diminishing received power. At 100 km, a 50 MHz bandwidth supports up to 4500 Mbps, while at 3000 km, capacity drops to around 300 Mbps. The outage probability analysis shows that higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thresholds substantially increase the likelihood of communication failures, especially at distances exceeding 2000 km. For instance, at 3000 km, the outage probability for a 15 dB SNR threshold reaches approximately 25%, compared to less than 5% for a 5 dB threshold. These results underscore the critical trade-offs in designing 5G–satellite IoT networks, balancing bandwidth, frequency, SNR thresholds, and satellite altitudes for optimal performance across diverse IoT applications. The analysis provides valuable insights for enhancing connectivity and reliability in 5G–satellite integrated networks, especially in remote and underserved regions.

Smart CitiesVol. 7(6)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Satellite Communication Systems
10.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.