NECROPOLITICS AND MODERNITY: UNVEILING THE ‘EMPIRE’S DIRTY WORK’ IN HEART OF DARKNESS, A PASSAGE TO INDIA AND BURMESE DAYS

Abstract This article examines the complex interplay between modernity, colonialism, and necropolitics as represented in Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, A Passage to India by E.M. Forster, and Burmese Days by George Orwell. These modernist texts not only critique the dehumanization and systemic extermination justified by colonial ideologies but also highlight the ways in which colonial power uses necropolitical strategies to govern life and death. By integrating Achille Mbembe's concept of necropolitics with Michel Foucault's theory of biopower, this analysis elucidates the racial and sovereign dynamics that both underpin and challenge colonial regimes. The paper contextualizes the relationship between modernism and colonial history, highlighting how modernist narratives reflect a crisis in the colonial agenda and embody Enlightenment ideals that have shaped the socio-political landscape of empires. These narratives offer a critical view of the dichotomy between the colonizer and the colonized, emphasizing the fractured and uncertain epistemological underpinnings of imperial logic. The examination of Conrad, Forster, and Orwell focuses on the ethical and psychological turmoil from colonial dominance, probing how colonialism justifies violence and subjugation. The study reveals how colonial powers exert necropolitical control, deciding who lives and who dies—a control that extends beyond physical dominance to the psychological colonization of minds, perpetuating colonial hegemony. Ultimately, this paper shows how modernist texts critique colonial necropolitics and expose the racial prejudices and biopolitical strategies essential for maintaining colonial regimes. These texts provide profound insights into the lasting impacts of colonialism on contemporary understandings of race, sovereignty, and resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2024.64.2.7
Primary Topic
Joseph Conrad and Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NECROPOLITICS AND MODERNITY: UNVEILING THE ‘EMPIRE’S DIRTY WORK’ IN HEART OF DARKNESS, A PASSAGE TO INDIA AND BURMESE DAYS

Ayşegül Demir, İsmail Kaygısız
Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Joseph Conrad and Literature
article

NECROPOLITICS AND MODERNITY: UNVEILING THE ‘EMPIRE’S DIRTY WORK’ IN HEART OF DARKNESS, A PASSAGE TO INDIA AND BURMESE DAYS

Ayşegül Demir, İsmail Kaygısız
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the complex interplay between modernity, colonialism, and necropolitics as represented in Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, A Passage to India by E.M. Forster, and Burmese Days by George Orwell. These modernist texts not only critique the dehumanization and systemic extermination justified by colonial ideologies but also highlight the ways in which colonial power uses necropolitical strategies to govern life and death. By integrating Achille Mbembe's concept of necropolitics with Michel Foucault's theory of biopower, this analysis elucidates the racial and sovereign dynamics that both underpin and challenge colonial regimes. The paper contextualizes the relationship between modernism and colonial history, highlighting how modernist narratives reflect a crisis in the colonial agenda and embody Enlightenment ideals that have shaped the socio-political landscape of empires. These narratives offer a critical view of the dichotomy between the colonizer and the colonized, emphasizing the fractured and uncertain epistemological underpinnings of imperial logic. The examination of Conrad, Forster, and Orwell focuses on the ethical and psychological turmoil from colonial dominance, probing how colonialism justifies violence and subjugation. The study reveals how colonial powers exert necropolitical control, deciding who lives and who dies—a control that extends beyond physical dominance to the psychological colonization of minds, perpetuating colonial hegemony. Ultimately, this paper shows how modernist texts critique colonial necropolitics and expose the racial prejudices and biopolitical strategies essential for maintaining colonial regimes. These texts provide profound insights into the lasting impacts of colonialism on contemporary understandings of race, sovereignty, and resistance.

Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi DergisiVol. 64(2)
Munzur University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Joseph Conrad and Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NECROPOLITICS AND MODERNITY: UNVEILING THE ‘EMPIRE’S DIRTY WORK’ IN HEART OF DARKNESS, A PASSAGE TO INDIA AND BURMESE DAYS — Ayşegül Demir, İsmail Kaygısız · Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS