Information Costs and the Non‐Take‐Up of Social Benefits: A Detailed Exploration of Belgian Social Assistance

ABSTRACT In many European countries, about half of those eligible for means‐tested social benefits, do not receive the benefits to which they are entitled. In the literature, a wide range of factors have been identified that potentially contribute to the non‐take‐up of social benefits. Particular attention has been paid to factors that relate to the claimants themselves, including the experienced or perceived costs associated with claiming benefits and negative attitudes towards claiming benefits. However, the theory on the conditions under which claiming costs matter is still underdeveloped, while the evidence on the relative importance of claiming costs is to a large extent indirect and based on proxy variables. In this paper, we measure individual and household (dis)incentives for taking up social assistance benefits more directly, and evaluate to what extent they are associated with non‐take‐up of social assistance for people at active age in Belgium. To do so, we use a combination of register data and data from the TAKE survey, a new representative survey tailored for studying the determinants of non‐take‐up in Belgium. Combining both sources of information and detailed simulations of eligibility, we show that information costs are much better at predicting non‐receipt of social assistance than process costs and stigma. While attitudes towards the receipt of benefits are of little consequence, optimism about the future seems to matter more, as does the level of material deprivation experienced by the household. We also explore under what conditions information costs matter most. While findings are not very robust, our data suggest that the importance of information costs is mediated by the level optimism about the future and changes in household composition that act as trigger events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13112
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information Costs and the Non‐Take‐Up of Social Benefits: A Detailed Exploration of Belgian Social Assistance

Julie Janssens, Tim Goedemé, Meilyn Bolland
Social Policy and Administration
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Information Costs and the Non‐Take‐Up of Social Benefits: A Detailed Exploration of Belgian Social Assistance

Julie Janssens, Tim Goedemé, Meilyn Bolland
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many European countries, about half of those eligible for means‐tested social benefits, do not receive the benefits to which they are entitled. In the literature, a wide range of factors have been identified that potentially contribute to the non‐take‐up of social benefits. Particular attention has been paid to factors that relate to the claimants themselves, including the experienced or perceived costs associated with claiming benefits and negative attitudes towards claiming benefits. However, the theory on the conditions under which claiming costs matter is still underdeveloped, while the evidence on the relative importance of claiming costs is to a large extent indirect and based on proxy variables. In this paper, we measure individual and household (dis)incentives for taking up social assistance benefits more directly, and evaluate to what extent they are associated with non‐take‐up of social assistance for people at active age in Belgium. To do so, we use a combination of register data and data from the TAKE survey, a new representative survey tailored for studying the determinants of non‐take‐up in Belgium. Combining both sources of information and detailed simulations of eligibility, we show that information costs are much better at predicting non‐receipt of social assistance than process costs and stigma. While attitudes towards the receipt of benefits are of little consequence, optimism about the future seems to matter more, as does the level of material deprivation experienced by the household. We also explore under what conditions information costs matter most. While findings are not very robust, our data suggest that the importance of information costs is mediated by the level optimism about the future and changes in household composition that act as trigger events.

Social Policy and AdministrationVol. 59(7)
University of Antwerp (BE), University of Liège (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Information Costs and the Non‐Take‐Up of Social Benefits: A Detailed Exploration of Belgian Social Assistance — Julie Janssens, Tim Goedemé, et al. · Social Policy and Administration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS