What Can We Learn about the Effects of Democracy Using Cross-National Data?

More than 1,100 studies have been published that examine the effects of democracy using cross-national data since 2000. This article examines whether these analyses have sufficient statistical power to detect an effect of democracy. Using Monte Carlo simulation and examining consensus effects previously reported in the literature, the article finds that studies are only powered to detect very strong effects of democracy when examining countries over time. This raises questions about what sort of relationships can be analyzed using cross-national data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424001278
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Can We Learn about the Effects of Democracy Using Cross-National Data?

Jonathan Doucette
4 citations
American Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.92
article

What Can We Learn about the Effects of Democracy Using Cross-National Data?

Jonathan Doucette
article en
4 citations

Abstract

More than 1,100 studies have been published that examine the effects of democracy using cross-national data since 2000. This article examines whether these analyses have sufficient statistical power to detect an effect of democracy. Using Monte Carlo simulation and examining consensus effects previously reported in the literature, the article finds that studies are only powered to detect very strong effects of democracy when examining countries over time. This raises questions about what sort of relationships can be analyzed using cross-national data.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(3)
Aalborg University (DK)
Aalborg Universitet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Can We Learn about the Effects of Democracy Using Cross-National Data? — Jonathan Doucette · American Political Science Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS