Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement

Social network analysis is becoming increasingly popular for studying the past. However, during the last decades, studies have applied pre-collected datasets for social network analysis, which limits the use of the method to cases where such data is available. This article presents another approach whereby two-mode network data are collected from less structured documentary sources, and the findings are enriched with documentary evidence. The approach is used to analyze how 42 notable members of the British New Education movement between 1905 and 1935 were affiliated with 31 organizations. The analysis provides empirical support for the previously proposed idea that there were two kinds of prominence within the movement: that of conveners, who formed close-knit groups with like-minded people, and that of mediators, who built bridges between such groups. Moreover, we discuss how this structure helped the movement to achieve its goals of more up-to-date, equally available education. The method presented in the article is suitable for researchers working with bibliographical or archive material in various domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2024.2431487
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement

Lauri Luoto
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement

Lauri Luoto
article en

Abstract

Social network analysis is becoming increasingly popular for studying the past. However, during the last decades, studies have applied pre-collected datasets for social network analysis, which limits the use of the method to cases where such data is available. This article presents another approach whereby two-mode network data are collected from less structured documentary sources, and the findings are enriched with documentary evidence. The approach is used to analyze how 42 notable members of the British New Education movement between 1905 and 1935 were affiliated with 31 organizations. The analysis provides empirical support for the previously proposed idea that there were two kinds of prominence within the movement: that of conveners, who formed close-knit groups with like-minded people, and that of mediators, who built bridges between such groups. Moreover, we discuss how this structure helped the movement to achieve its goals of more up-to-date, equally available education. The method presented in the article is suitable for researchers working with bibliographical or archive material in various domains.

Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary HistoryVol. 58(1)
University of Turku (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement — Lauri Luoto · Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS