Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas

This piece offers a space for critical debate and reflection on the methodological and epistemological foundations that underpin feminist research on conflict, violence and peace. Taking stock of the variety of approaches and theoretical standpoints, we examine the (feminist) politics of knowledge production in academia and its limitations. We discuss how ontological and epistemological assumptions shape what counts as (feminist) academic knowledge and what is considered to be possible in (policy) practice. The article makes three contributions. First, we argue that the production of knowledge within disciplinary boundaries, and in particular, International Relations, is closely related to the discipline's history of positivism and exclusion. Second, to counter that, we propose a close engagement with Black and decolonial feminist methods of feeling-knowing, storytelling and collaboration. Third, we highlight that embracing uncertainty means accepting incommensurability and heterogeneity, as well as a shift away from the urge to accumulate knowledge towards paying attention to the process of co-constructing it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298241298689
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas

Priscyll Anctil Avoine, Nancy R. Tapias Torrado, María Martín de Almagro, Marie E. Berry et al.
3 citations
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Gender, Security, and Conflict
2.79
article

Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas

Priscyll Anctil Avoine, Nancy R. Tapias Torrado, María Martín de Almagro, Marie E. Berry, Julia Zulver
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This piece offers a space for critical debate and reflection on the methodological and epistemological foundations that underpin feminist research on conflict, violence and peace. Taking stock of the variety of approaches and theoretical standpoints, we examine the (feminist) politics of knowledge production in academia and its limitations. We discuss how ontological and epistemological assumptions shape what counts as (feminist) academic knowledge and what is considered to be possible in (policy) practice. The article makes three contributions. First, we argue that the production of knowledge within disciplinary boundaries, and in particular, International Relations, is closely related to the discipline's history of positivism and exclusion. Second, to counter that, we propose a close engagement with Black and decolonial feminist methods of feeling-knowing, storytelling and collaboration. Third, we highlight that embracing uncertainty means accepting incommensurability and heterogeneity, as well as a shift away from the urge to accumulate knowledge towards paying attention to the process of co-constructing it.

Millennium Journal of International StudiesVol. 53(1)
Swedish Defence University (SE), University of Denver (US), University of Waterloo (CA)
VINNOVA, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Doing Feminist Research on Conflict, Violence and Peace: Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas — Priscyll Anctil Avoine, Nancy R. Tapias Torrado, et al. · Millennium Journal of International Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS