Bias and Debiasing Strategies in Qualitative Data Collection

Abstract A widespread view has it that qualitative research in the social sciences is of poor quality because it lacks effective debiasing methods. In this paper, I zoom in on researcher bias in qualitative data collection. First, I provide a brief outline of qualitative data collection and develop a suitable account of bias. On that basis, I argue that qualitative researchers may mitigate researcher bias through the combined use of two strategies that capitalize on main characteristics of qualitative data collection. Lastly, I defend the two debiasing strategies against possible objections to their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.70
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
66.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias and Debiasing Strategies in Qualitative Data Collection

Julie Zahle
11 citations
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
66.47
article

Bias and Debiasing Strategies in Qualitative Data Collection

Julie Zahle
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract A widespread view has it that qualitative research in the social sciences is of poor quality because it lacks effective debiasing methods. In this paper, I zoom in on researcher bias in qualitative data collection. First, I provide a brief outline of qualitative data collection and develop a suitable account of bias. On that basis, I argue that qualitative researchers may mitigate researcher bias through the combined use of two strategies that capitalize on main characteristics of qualitative data collection. Lastly, I defend the two debiasing strategies against possible objections to their effectiveness.

Philosophy of ScienceVol. 92(3)
University of Bergen (NO)
Helsingin Yliopisto, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Philosophy and History of Science
66.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.