Hidden field discovery of turbulent flow over porous media using physics-informed neural networks

This study utilizes physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to analyze turbulent flow passing over fluid-saturated porous media. The fluid dynamics in this configuration encompass complex features, including leakage, channeling, and pulsation at the pore-scale, which pose challenges for detailed flow characterization using conventional modeling and experimental approaches. Our PINN model integrates (i) implementation of domain decomposition in regions exhibiting abrupt flow changes, (ii) parameterization of the Reynolds number in the PINN model, and (iii) Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) k−ε turbulence model within the PINN framework. The domain decomposition method, distinguishing between non-porous and porous regions, enables turbulent flow reconstruction with a reduced training dataset dependency. Furthermore, Reynolds number parameterization in the PINN model facilitates the inference of hidden first and second-order statistics flow fields. The developed PINN approach tackles both the reconstruction of turbulent flow fields (forward problem) and the prediction of hidden turbulent flow fields (inverse problem). For training the PINN algorithm, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data based on the RANS approach are deployed. The findings indicate that the parameterized domain-decomposed PINN model can accurately predict flow fields while requiring fewer internal training datasets. For the forward problem, when compared to the CFD results, the relative L2 norm errors in PINN predictions for streamwise velocity and turbulent kinetic energy are 5.44% and 18.90%, respectively. For the inverse problem, the predicted velocity magnitudes at the hidden low and high Reynolds numbers in the shear layer region show absolute relative differences of 8.55% and 4.39% compared to the CFD results, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241362
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden field discovery of turbulent flow over porous media using physics-informed neural networks

Yasser Mahmoudi, Seohee Jang, Mohammad Jadidi
7 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
2.62
article

Hidden field discovery of turbulent flow over porous media using physics-informed neural networks

Yasser Mahmoudi, Seohee Jang, Mohammad Jadidi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study utilizes physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to analyze turbulent flow passing over fluid-saturated porous media. The fluid dynamics in this configuration encompass complex features, including leakage, channeling, and pulsation at the pore-scale, which pose challenges for detailed flow characterization using conventional modeling and experimental approaches. Our PINN model integrates (i) implementation of domain decomposition in regions exhibiting abrupt flow changes, (ii) parameterization of the Reynolds number in the PINN model, and (iii) Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) k−ε turbulence model within the PINN framework. The domain decomposition method, distinguishing between non-porous and porous regions, enables turbulent flow reconstruction with a reduced training dataset dependency. Furthermore, Reynolds number parameterization in the PINN model facilitates the inference of hidden first and second-order statistics flow fields. The developed PINN approach tackles both the reconstruction of turbulent flow fields (forward problem) and the prediction of hidden turbulent flow fields (inverse problem). For training the PINN algorithm, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data based on the RANS approach are deployed. The findings indicate that the parameterized domain-decomposed PINN model can accurately predict flow fields while requiring fewer internal training datasets. For the forward problem, when compared to the CFD results, the relative L2 norm errors in PINN predictions for streamwise velocity and turbulent kinetic energy are 5.44% and 18.90%, respectively. For the inverse problem, the predicted velocity magnitudes at the hidden low and high Reynolds numbers in the shear layer region show absolute relative differences of 8.55% and 4.39% compared to the CFD results, respectively.

Physics of FluidsVol. 36(12)
University of Manchester (GB)
University of Manchester, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
2.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.