Looking beyond Popper: how philosophy can be relevant to ecology

Current workflows in academic ecology rarely allow an engagement of ecologists with philosophers, or with contemporary philosophical work. We argue that this is a missed opportunity for enriching ecological reasoning and practice, because many questions in ecology overlap with philosophical questions and with current topics in contemporary philosophy of science. One obstacle to a closer connection and collaboration between the fields is the limited awareness of scientists, including ecologists, of current philosophical questions, developments and ideas. In this article, we aim to overcome this obstacle and trigger more collaborations between ecologists and philosophers. First, we provide an overview of philosophical research relevant to ecologists. Second, we use examples to demonstrate that many ecological questions have a philosophical dimension and point to related philosophical work. We elaborate on one example – the debate around the appropriate level of complexity of ecological models – to show in more detail how philosophy can enrich ecology. Finally, we provide suggestions for how to initiate collaborative projects involving both ecologists and philosophers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10994
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking beyond Popper: how philosophy can be relevant to ecology

Philip A. Stephens, Gregory P. Dietl, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Katie H. Morrow et al.
2 citations
Oikos
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
1.38
article

Looking beyond Popper: how philosophy can be relevant to ecology

Philip A. Stephens, Gregory P. Dietl, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Katie H. Morrow, Andrew M. Latimer, Chunlong Liu, Tina Heger, William C. Bausman, David J. Gibson, Yuval Itescu, Kurt Jax, James R. Griesemer, Marie I. Kaiser, Jostein Starrfelt, Alkistis Elliott‐Graves, Carsten F. Dormann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Current workflows in academic ecology rarely allow an engagement of ecologists with philosophers, or with contemporary philosophical work. We argue that this is a missed opportunity for enriching ecological reasoning and practice, because many questions in ecology overlap with philosophical questions and with current topics in contemporary philosophy of science. One obstacle to a closer connection and collaboration between the fields is the limited awareness of scientists, including ecologists, of current philosophical questions, developments and ideas. In this article, we aim to overcome this obstacle and trigger more collaborations between ecologists and philosophers. First, we provide an overview of philosophical research relevant to ecologists. Second, we use examples to demonstrate that many ecological questions have a philosophical dimension and point to related philosophical work. We elaborate on one example – the debate around the appropriate level of complexity of ecological models – to show in more detail how philosophy can enrich ecology. Finally, we provide suggestions for how to initiate collaborative projects involving both ecologists and philosophers.

OikosVol. 2025(2)
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US), Statistics Norway (NO), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Freiburg (DE), Durham University (GB), Bielefeld University (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Cornell University (US), Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE), Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (DE), Ocean University of China (CN), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), University of California, Davis (US), Ithaca College (US), University of Haifa (IL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.