Seasonal dynamics of forage nutrition in smallholder goat production systems in Malawi

Forage and browse are a valuable natural resource in Malawi that can be used to support livestock production which, in turn, can contribute towards delivering income and nutrition to households and communities. However, the quality and quantity of forages can be poor, especially during the dry season. The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional composition of naturally available forages across smallholder livestock systems in Malawi, with particular focus on seasonal differences in quality and quantity. Samples of herbaceous forages and browse were collected over 17 months, across four sites (30 farms/smallholders) in central Malawi. Forages underwent nutritional analysis for crude protein, fibre and ash/organic matter. NDVI obtained from satellite imagery was used as a proxy for forage availability. Forage nutrition and availability were most adequate in the wet season, with higher concentrations of crude protein and a greater availability of herbaceous plants. There were significant differences in low-digestibility fibre fractions between locations, likely due to local factors such as soil and hydrology. The fall in crude protein concentrations from the wet season to the dry season along with a reduction in forage biomass represents a seasonal nutritional feed gap that may impact productivity within livestock systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Range and Forage Science
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2024.2428295
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal dynamics of forage nutrition in smallholder goat production systems in Malawi

Lovemore C. Gwiriri, Javier Ventura-Cordero, Winchester Mvula, Taro Takahashi et al.
4 citations
African Journal of Range and Forage Science
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.84
article

Seasonal dynamics of forage nutrition in smallholder goat production systems in Malawi

Lovemore C. Gwiriri, Javier Ventura-Cordero, Winchester Mvula, Taro Takahashi, Eric R. Morgan, Patson C. Nalivata, Andrew S. Cooke, Michael R. F. Lee, A. C. L. Safalaoh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Forage and browse are a valuable natural resource in Malawi that can be used to support livestock production which, in turn, can contribute towards delivering income and nutrition to households and communities. However, the quality and quantity of forages can be poor, especially during the dry season. The objective of this study was to assess the nutritional composition of naturally available forages across smallholder livestock systems in Malawi, with particular focus on seasonal differences in quality and quantity. Samples of herbaceous forages and browse were collected over 17 months, across four sites (30 farms/smallholders) in central Malawi. Forages underwent nutritional analysis for crude protein, fibre and ash/organic matter. NDVI obtained from satellite imagery was used as a proxy for forage availability. Forage nutrition and availability were most adequate in the wet season, with higher concentrations of crude protein and a greater availability of herbaceous plants. There were significant differences in low-digestibility fibre fractions between locations, likely due to local factors such as soil and hydrology. The fall in crude protein concentrations from the wet season to the dry season along with a reduction in forage biomass represents a seasonal nutritional feed gap that may impact productivity within livestock systems.

African Journal of Range and Forage ScienceVol. 41(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Rothamsted Research (GB), Autonomous University of Campeche (MX), University of Bristol (GB), Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW), University of Lincoln (GB), Coventry University (GB), Harper Adams University (GB)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.