Mechanisms of chest injuries from steering wheel intrusion in frontal collisions

Frontal collisions are the most common traffic accidents, during which drivers without properly using seat belts may be impacted by the steering wheel. Given the different driving habits and steering shaft angles, it is imperative to investigate the range of driver injuries incurred by the steering wheel from different angles. This study analyzed the driver’s thoracoabdominal injuries using the control variable method and represented them in a simulation matrix format. In addition, a GHBMC human model was utilized to simulate the thoracoabdominal injuries. The thoracoabdominal injury mechanism of the driver was investigated through simulation experiments at the steering shaft angles of 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45°. Two different seat shapes were analyzed to examine the influence of seat shapes on the driver’s movement during collisions. The results showed that the thoracic stress maximized at 1.051 GPa under the steering shaft angle of 40°. The curve fitting function was derived based on logistic regression to clarify the relationship between the steering shaft angle and maximum thorax compression. Subsequently, this function was employed to quantify the maximum compression at the steering shaft angle of 44°. The findings indicate that seat shape variations significantly influence chest compression during frontal collisions. From a passive safety perspective, improving seat shape and adjusting the steering shaft angle provides a significant reference value for reducing driver injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070241300208
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of chest injuries from steering wheel intrusion in frontal collisions

Xikai Zhang, Sen Lin Xiao, Xudong Peng, Baocheng Zheng et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
0.84
article

Mechanisms of chest injuries from steering wheel intrusion in frontal collisions

Xikai Zhang, Sen Lin Xiao, Xudong Peng, Baocheng Zheng, Yuan Min
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Frontal collisions are the most common traffic accidents, during which drivers without properly using seat belts may be impacted by the steering wheel. Given the different driving habits and steering shaft angles, it is imperative to investigate the range of driver injuries incurred by the steering wheel from different angles. This study analyzed the driver’s thoracoabdominal injuries using the control variable method and represented them in a simulation matrix format. In addition, a GHBMC human model was utilized to simulate the thoracoabdominal injuries. The thoracoabdominal injury mechanism of the driver was investigated through simulation experiments at the steering shaft angles of 30°, 35°, 40°, and 45°. Two different seat shapes were analyzed to examine the influence of seat shapes on the driver’s movement during collisions. The results showed that the thoracic stress maximized at 1.051 GPa under the steering shaft angle of 40°. The curve fitting function was derived based on logistic regression to clarify the relationship between the steering shaft angle and maximum thorax compression. Subsequently, this function was employed to quantify the maximum compression at the steering shaft angle of 44°. The findings indicate that seat shape variations significantly influence chest compression during frontal collisions. From a passive safety perspective, improving seat shape and adjusting the steering shaft angle provides a significant reference value for reducing driver injuries.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile EngineeringVol. 239(14)
Hebei University of Technology (CN), China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CN), Beijing Automotive Group (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.