Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity

Abstract The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00623-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity

Elsbeth Turcan, S. Walden Miller, Desmond U. Patton, Jessica A. Grieser et al.
1 citations
AI and Ethics
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
3.91
article

Unmasking camouflage: exploring the challenges of large language models in deciphering African American language & online performativity

Elsbeth Turcan, S. Walden Miller, Desmond U. Patton, Jessica A. Grieser, Javier García-Pérez, J A Shepard, Kathleen McKeown, Shana Kleiner, Nick Deas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The growing accessibility of large language models (LLMs) has raised many questions about the reliability of probabilistically generated natural language responses. While researchers have documented how bias in the training data leads to biased and ethically problematic output, little attention has been paid to the problems which arise from the nature of the varieties of language on which these models are trained. In particular, certain kinds of expressive and performative language use are more common among African American social media users than they occur in the naturalistic speech of African Americans, a discrepancy which models may fail to take into account when they are training on easily-scraped data as being representative of African American speech. Because LLM training data is generally proprietary, in this work we simulate the training data using a collected dataset consisting of 274 posts from Twitter, Reddit, and Hip-Hop lyrics and analyze how LLMs interpreted their meaning. We highlight the difficulties LLMs, including GPT-3 and GPT-4, have in understanding performative AAL and examine how camouflaging and performativity are addressed (or not) by LLMs and demonstrate the harmful implications of misinterpreting online performance.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(1)
University of Michigan (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.