Characterizing Directivity in Small (M 2.4–5) Aftershocks of the Ridgecrest Sequence

ABSTRACT Directivity, or the focusing of energy along the direction of an earthquake rupture, is a common property of earthquakes of all sizes and can cause increased hazard due to azimuthally dependent ground-motion amplification. For small earthquakes, the effects of directivity are generally less pronounced due to reduced rupture size, yet the directivity in small events can bias source property estimates and provide important insights into general regional faulting patterns. However, due to observational limitations, directivity is usually only measured and modeled for large events. As such, many studies of small earthquakes either ignore directivity altogether or assume a constant rupture direction for all events in a cluster. In our study, we apply a refined directivity fitting method constrained with two separate methods of source deconvolution to the dataset of aftershocks of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes, which contain a large number of well-recorded small-to-mid sized earthquakes occurring in close proximity to each other. The revealed directivity of 100+ small (M 2.4–5) earthquakes is highly heterogeneous and primarily oblique to and away from the main fault strike, suggesting a complex postseismic stress redistribution. In addition, the energy focusing effect of directivity appears to bias the selection of high-quality data from stations in the direction of rupture, leading to average stress-drop increases of 50% if directivity is not accounted for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120240146
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing Directivity in Small (M 2.4–5) Aftershocks of the Ridgecrest Sequence

Shanna Chu, A. Baltay, Rachel E. Abercrombie
12 citations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
6.41
article

Characterizing Directivity in Small (M 2.4–5) Aftershocks of the Ridgecrest Sequence

Shanna Chu, A. Baltay, Rachel E. Abercrombie
article en
12 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Directivity, or the focusing of energy along the direction of an earthquake rupture, is a common property of earthquakes of all sizes and can cause increased hazard due to azimuthally dependent ground-motion amplification. For small earthquakes, the effects of directivity are generally less pronounced due to reduced rupture size, yet the directivity in small events can bias source property estimates and provide important insights into general regional faulting patterns. However, due to observational limitations, directivity is usually only measured and modeled for large events. As such, many studies of small earthquakes either ignore directivity altogether or assume a constant rupture direction for all events in a cluster. In our study, we apply a refined directivity fitting method constrained with two separate methods of source deconvolution to the dataset of aftershocks of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes, which contain a large number of well-recorded small-to-mid sized earthquakes occurring in close proximity to each other. The revealed directivity of 100+ small (M 2.4–5) earthquakes is highly heterogeneous and primarily oblique to and away from the main fault strike, suggesting a complex postseismic stress redistribution. In addition, the energy focusing effect of directivity appears to bias the selection of high-quality data from stations in the direction of rupture, leading to average stress-drop increases of 50% if directivity is not accounted for.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 115(3)
Boston University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
6.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.