Awareness and Perception of Digital Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

This study aimed to identify and assess smallholder farmers' awareness and perceptions of digital technologies in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The study used a cross-sectional survey of a purposively selected sample of 250 smallholder farmers from Port St Johns (PSJ) and Ingquza Hill (IH) Local Municipalities. The Likert scale and a perceptive index were used to analyse the data. The study found that 57.4% and 74.7% of smallholder farmers were aware of digital technologies. Fifty-six percent to 70.6%of smallholder farmers were aware of a combination of smartphones, radios, and TV. There was indifference to the reliability of digital technologies as indicated by 42.7% to 52.9%, with 97.8% to 98.1% highlighting the need to improve awareness of digital technologies, mainly through awareness campaigns and information days as indicated by 51.6% from PSJ and farmer training as highlighted by 50.6% from IH. About 76.4% of the smallholder farmers did not have adequate knowledge of digital technologies, while 54.4% did not find them user-friendly. However, 88.0% indicated that it made farming easier, is labour saving (69.6%), improves agricultural production (81.2%), improves access to information (77.6%), easier access to extension (65.6%), and will increase farm output (71.6%). However, digital technologies were expensive (78.8%), caused a digital divide (69.2%), and required specific skills (81.0%). There was a negative perception towards digital technologies by 69.6% of the smallholder farmers. The study concluded that negative perception is mainly influenced by cost, skill requirement, lack of knowledge, and difficulty in use. There was awareness of less complicated digital technologies. Recommendations include promoting digital technologies through farmer groups or associations such as farmer field schools. Awareness campaigns through extension officers can be used to promote digital technologies to smallholder farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir landbouvoorligting/South African journal of agricultural extension
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2024/v52n5a16200
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness and Perception of Digital Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Saul Ngarava, Abbyssinia Mushunje, Leocadia Zhou, N.V. Bontsa
4 citations
Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir landbouvoorligting/South African journal of agricultural extension
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.70
article

Awareness and Perception of Digital Technologies by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Saul Ngarava, Abbyssinia Mushunje, Leocadia Zhou, N.V. Bontsa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and assess smallholder farmers' awareness and perceptions of digital technologies in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. The study used a cross-sectional survey of a purposively selected sample of 250 smallholder farmers from Port St Johns (PSJ) and Ingquza Hill (IH) Local Municipalities. The Likert scale and a perceptive index were used to analyse the data. The study found that 57.4% and 74.7% of smallholder farmers were aware of digital technologies. Fifty-six percent to 70.6%of smallholder farmers were aware of a combination of smartphones, radios, and TV. There was indifference to the reliability of digital technologies as indicated by 42.7% to 52.9%, with 97.8% to 98.1% highlighting the need to improve awareness of digital technologies, mainly through awareness campaigns and information days as indicated by 51.6% from PSJ and farmer training as highlighted by 50.6% from IH. About 76.4% of the smallholder farmers did not have adequate knowledge of digital technologies, while 54.4% did not find them user-friendly. However, 88.0% indicated that it made farming easier, is labour saving (69.6%), improves agricultural production (81.2%), improves access to information (77.6%), easier access to extension (65.6%), and will increase farm output (71.6%). However, digital technologies were expensive (78.8%), caused a digital divide (69.2%), and required specific skills (81.0%). There was a negative perception towards digital technologies by 69.6% of the smallholder farmers. The study concluded that negative perception is mainly influenced by cost, skill requirement, lack of knowledge, and difficulty in use. There was awareness of less complicated digital technologies. Recommendations include promoting digital technologies through farmer groups or associations such as farmer field schools. Awareness campaigns through extension officers can be used to promote digital technologies to smallholder farmers.

Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir landbouvoorligting/South African journal of agricultural extensionVol. 52(5)
University of Fort Hare (ZA), Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.