The weights of drivers’ on-route concerns in car-following behaviours

Among the available studies run on reproducing, learning and classifying driving styles, only few have quantified the weights of drivers’ on-route concerns. A new method is proposed to quantify the issue at hand in car-following behaviours, in which a multi-objective optimisation model with crash risk, comfort and travel time objectives as the driver’s decision-making process is trained. This model is trained based on different car-following trajectory real data, distinguished from each other by the driving phase and behaviour of the following vehicle, where the best-matched weights for the model’s objectives are identified. The results indicate that the weights obtained for the crash risk and comfort objectives are of more concern compared to travel time. The weights of the crash risk, comfort and travel time objectives are 0.4, 0.4 and 0.2, respectively. In deceleration driving phases, timid and aggressive drivers weigh the model’s objectives differently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.23.00112
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The weights of drivers’ on-route concerns in car-following behaviours

Arsalan Salehikalam, Ali A. Abdi
1 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport
Traffic and Road Safety
0.36
article

The weights of drivers’ on-route concerns in car-following behaviours

Arsalan Salehikalam, Ali A. Abdi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Among the available studies run on reproducing, learning and classifying driving styles, only few have quantified the weights of drivers’ on-route concerns. A new method is proposed to quantify the issue at hand in car-following behaviours, in which a multi-objective optimisation model with crash risk, comfort and travel time objectives as the driver’s decision-making process is trained. This model is trained based on different car-following trajectory real data, distinguished from each other by the driving phase and behaviour of the following vehicle, where the best-matched weights for the model’s objectives are identified. The results indicate that the weights obtained for the crash risk and comfort objectives are of more concern compared to travel time. The weights of the crash risk, comfort and travel time objectives are 0.4, 0.4 and 0.2, respectively. In deceleration driving phases, timid and aggressive drivers weigh the model’s objectives differently.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - TransportVol. 178(6)
Imam Khomeini International University (IR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Traffic and Road Safety
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.