Anticompetitive Consequences of Exclusivity Clauses Contained in Shopping Centres’ Lease Agreements

This article discusses the impact of commercial lease agreements concluded in shopping centres that contain exclusivity clauses on competition. It assesses whether these clauses restrict equitable retailer participation in shopping centres, thereby denying consumers competitive prices and product choices. It also demonstrates that the South African Competition Commission has classified lease agreements' exclusivity clauses as problematic and persuaded the major grocery retailers to phase them out. While this is a positive step, this article argues that there should be some regulatory framework that can ensure that none of these retailers continue to restrict competition in shopping centres by enforcing exclusivity clauses. The Commission should play a prominent role in ensuring that the terms of the consent orders signed by some of these retailers are respected to ensure that competition is promoted in shopping centres in South Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159//1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17231
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticompetitive Consequences of Exclusivity Clauses Contained in Shopping Centres’ Lease Agreements

Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Anticompetitive Consequences of Exclusivity Clauses Contained in Shopping Centres’ Lease Agreements

Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the impact of commercial lease agreements concluded in shopping centres that contain exclusivity clauses on competition. It assesses whether these clauses restrict equitable retailer participation in shopping centres, thereby denying consumers competitive prices and product choices. It also demonstrates that the South African Competition Commission has classified lease agreements' exclusivity clauses as problematic and persuaded the major grocery retailers to phase them out. While this is a positive step, this article argues that there should be some regulatory framework that can ensure that none of these retailers continue to restrict competition in shopping centres by enforcing exclusivity clauses. The Commission should play a prominent role in ensuring that the terms of the consent orders signed by some of these retailers are respected to ensure that competition is promoted in shopping centres in South Africa.

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese RegsbladVol. 27
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anticompetitive Consequences of Exclusivity Clauses Contained in Shopping Centres’ Lease Agreements — Motseotsile Clement Marumoagae · Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS