Integrating Clinical and Histopathological Data to Predict Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Machine Learning Techniques

<b>Background:</b> Given the significant impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on transplant outcomes, the aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting the risk of DGF in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study was conducted using clinical and histopathological data collected between 2018 and 2022 at Ramathibodi Hospital from DDKT donors, recipients, and post-implantation time-zero kidney biopsy samples to develop predictive models. The performance of three ML models (neural network, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and traditional logistic regression on an independent test data set was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Brier score calibration. <b>Results:</b> Among 354 DDKT recipients, 64 (18.1%) experienced DGF. The key contributing factors included a donor body mass index > 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, donor diabetes mellitus, a prolonged cold ischemia time, a male recipient, and an interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score of 2-3 in the time-zero kidney biopsy sample. The random forest model had a specificity of 99.96% and an AUROC of 0.9323, the neural network model had a specificity of 97.43% and an AUROC of 0.844, and the XGBoost model had a specificity of 99.81% and an AUROC of 0.989. A traditional statistical model had a specificity of 84.4% and an AUROC of 0.769. <b>Conclusions:</b> Predictive models, especially XGBoost models, have potential as tools for assessing DGF risk post-DDKT, guiding acceptance decisions, and avoiding risky biopsy, and they may be crucial in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247502
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Clinical and Histopathological Data to Predict Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Machine Learning Techniques

Sansanee Thotsiri, Napun Sutharattanapong, Kun Sirisopana, Nuttapon Arpornsujaritkun et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.02
article

Integrating Clinical and Histopathological Data to Predict Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Machine Learning Techniques

Sansanee Thotsiri, Napun Sutharattanapong, Kun Sirisopana, Nuttapon Arpornsujaritkun, Punlop Wiwattanathum, Suchin Worawichawong, Lionel Rostaing, Surasak Kantachuvesiri, Sittipath Tirasattayapitak, Cholatid Ratanatharathorn
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Given the significant impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on transplant outcomes, the aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting the risk of DGF in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study was conducted using clinical and histopathological data collected between 2018 and 2022 at Ramathibodi Hospital from DDKT donors, recipients, and post-implantation time-zero kidney biopsy samples to develop predictive models. The performance of three ML models (neural network, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and traditional logistic regression on an independent test data set was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Brier score calibration. <b>Results:</b> Among 354 DDKT recipients, 64 (18.1%) experienced DGF. The key contributing factors included a donor body mass index > 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, donor diabetes mellitus, a prolonged cold ischemia time, a male recipient, and an interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score of 2-3 in the time-zero kidney biopsy sample. The random forest model had a specificity of 99.96% and an AUROC of 0.9323, the neural network model had a specificity of 97.43% and an AUROC of 0.844, and the XGBoost model had a specificity of 99.81% and an AUROC of 0.989. A traditional statistical model had a specificity of 84.4% and an AUROC of 0.769. <b>Conclusions:</b> Predictive models, especially XGBoost models, have potential as tools for assessing DGF risk post-DDKT, guiding acceptance decisions, and avoiding risky biopsy, and they may be crucial in resource-limited settings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(24)
Mahidol University (TH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Mahidol University
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.