Peer to Peer (P2P) IR Optical Communication used for Underwater or Open Air Medium

Although the hydrosphere protects most of the world, scientists and researchers from all over the world think that the world is underwater because it is difficult to know the concept of underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) has recently received a lot of attention is not new , seawater's reduced blue-green light absorption window has rekindled interest in it recently, but the security issues surrounding it have received little attention. In this paper, we show how messages sent using UWOCs can be heard without the intention of the sender or receiver, using diffraction collision. This is attributed to its high data exchange capacity and low cost. Therefore, we organize this review around various aspects of the Underwater Optical Remote Switching (UOWC) field; here we introduce the main communication techniques and present their shortcomings and merits. Underwater optical wireless communications can support higher data rates with lower latency than their acoustic and RF counterparts. We also show for the first time that UWOC is possible even in the ultra-saline Dead Sea by analyzing how many Gaussian beams propagate through the water. We will review the connections and project plans and present a summary of the most prominent works from 1992 to the present. The paper is focused on those who need to embrace and concentrate on UOWC. [2] It ours an outline of the ongoing innovations and those possibly accessible soon. Specific consideration has been given to obring a new reference index, particularly on the utilization of single-photon collectors. We measure how far away the receiver can hear the message. Many theoretical studies and experiments focus on achieving effective communication strategies. This is important for optimization, military and security purposes, and for the management of maritime assets. Underwater communication technology, which uses acoustic or electromagnetic waves (in the radio frequency spectrum or light spectrum), has made great progress with the use of telephones and wireless. Although acoustic communication accepts long-distance communication, its low data rate, high speed, and negative effects on sea air have made people aware of communication based on electric waves. Electromagnetic waves provide high data and high speed communication. Also, the turbidity of the water does not affect underwater RF communication, air and water exchange. [2] However, they are very expensive. Surprisingly, none of the above methods can match the performance of wireless communication in the spectrum. We also examine the most important moments affecting light propagation and consider them together with coding techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62441/nano-ntp.vi.3557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer to Peer (P2P) IR Optical Communication used for Underwater or Open Air Medium

Reena Durugwar, Prof Dr. Sanket B. Kasturiwala
1 citations
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
0.35
article

Peer to Peer (P2P) IR Optical Communication used for Underwater or Open Air Medium

Reena Durugwar, Prof Dr. Sanket B. Kasturiwala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although the hydrosphere protects most of the world, scientists and researchers from all over the world think that the world is underwater because it is difficult to know the concept of underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) has recently received a lot of attention is not new , seawater's reduced blue-green light absorption window has rekindled interest in it recently, but the security issues surrounding it have received little attention. In this paper, we show how messages sent using UWOCs can be heard without the intention of the sender or receiver, using diffraction collision. This is attributed to its high data exchange capacity and low cost. Therefore, we organize this review around various aspects of the Underwater Optical Remote Switching (UOWC) field; here we introduce the main communication techniques and present their shortcomings and merits. Underwater optical wireless communications can support higher data rates with lower latency than their acoustic and RF counterparts. We also show for the first time that UWOC is possible even in the ultra-saline Dead Sea by analyzing how many Gaussian beams propagate through the water. We will review the connections and project plans and present a summary of the most prominent works from 1992 to the present. The paper is focused on those who need to embrace and concentrate on UOWC. [2] It ours an outline of the ongoing innovations and those possibly accessible soon. Specific consideration has been given to obring a new reference index, particularly on the utilization of single-photon collectors. We measure how far away the receiver can hear the message. Many theoretical studies and experiments focus on achieving effective communication strategies. This is important for optimization, military and security purposes, and for the management of maritime assets. Underwater communication technology, which uses acoustic or electromagnetic waves (in the radio frequency spectrum or light spectrum), has made great progress with the use of telephones and wireless. Although acoustic communication accepts long-distance communication, its low data rate, high speed, and negative effects on sea air have made people aware of communication based on electric waves. Electromagnetic waves provide high data and high speed communication. Also, the turbidity of the water does not affect underwater RF communication, air and water exchange. [2] However, they are very expensive. Surprisingly, none of the above methods can match the performance of wireless communication in the spectrum. We also examine the most important moments affecting light propagation and consider them together with coding techniques.

Nanotechnology Perceptions
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.