The world’s first case involving a generative artificial intelligence: Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co Ltd v AI Company (pseudonym)

Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co Ltd v AI Company (pseudonym) is the first in the world to render a judgment on whether a generative artificial intelligence service provider should bear copyright liability for the infringement of other people’s prior works by its generated content. The court ruled on the types of copyright exclusive rights involved in the infringement by generative artificial intelligence service providers. However, the court should not bypass addressing the prerequisite issue of the copyrightability of the generated content. More importantly, it established criteria for determining the duty of care of generative artificial intelligence service providers based on three aspects: the duty to establish a complaint and reporting mechanism, the duty to warn of potential risks and the duty to provide prominent labelling. By focusing on the duty of care, the court shifted the burden of proof for causation to the defendant, thereby avoiding the evidentiary challenges faced by European and American courts. Additionally, the court established specific measures to stop the infringement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.04.05
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The world’s first case involving a generative artificial intelligence: Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co Ltd v AI Company (pseudonym)

Hong Wu, Jiang Fen
Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

The world’s first case involving a generative artificial intelligence: Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co Ltd v AI Company (pseudonym)

Hong Wu, Jiang Fen
article en

Abstract

Shanghai Xinchuanghua Cultural Development Co Ltd v AI Company (pseudonym) is the first in the world to render a judgment on whether a generative artificial intelligence service provider should bear copyright liability for the infringement of other people’s prior works by its generated content. The court ruled on the types of copyright exclusive rights involved in the infringement by generative artificial intelligence service providers. However, the court should not bypass addressing the prerequisite issue of the copyrightability of the generated content. More importantly, it established criteria for determining the duty of care of generative artificial intelligence service providers based on three aspects: the duty to establish a complaint and reporting mechanism, the duty to warn of potential risks and the duty to provide prominent labelling. By focusing on the duty of care, the court shifted the burden of proof for causation to the defendant, thereby avoiding the evidentiary challenges faced by European and American courts. Additionally, the court established specific measures to stop the infringement.

Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual PropertyVol. 14(4)
Ningbo University (CN), Ningbo University of Technology (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.