A Comprehensive Survey on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management

The anticipated proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the airspace in the coming years has raised concerns about how to manage their flights to avoid collisions and crashes at various stages of flight. To this end, many Unmanned Aircraft Traffic Management systems (UTM) have been designed. These systems use various methods for managing UAV conflicts. Several surveys have reviewed conflict resolution methods for UAVs. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no survey specifically addressing conflict detection and resolution methods in UTM, particularly those using AI-based methods. Therefore, this article serves as a comprehensive survey of all UAVs conflicts detection and resolution methods proposed in the literature and their use in the UTM systems. This survey classifies the methods into two categories: classical (non-learning) methods and learning-based methods. Classical methods typically rely on pre-defined algorithms or rules for UAVs to avoid collisions, whereas Artificial Intelligence-based methods, including Machine Learning (ML) and especially Reinforcement Learning (RL), enable UAVs to adapt to their environment, autonomously resolve conflicts, and exhibit intelligent behavior based on their experiences. It also presents their application in the conflict resolution service for UTMs. Additionally, the challenges and issues associated with each type of methods are discussed. This article can serve as a foundational resource for researchers in guiding their selection of methods for conflict resolution, particularly those relevant to UTM systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2024.3509339
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Survey on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management

Amine Dhraief, Layth Sliman, Asma Hamissi
21 citations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
25.98
article

A Comprehensive Survey on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management

Amine Dhraief, Layth Sliman, Asma Hamissi
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The anticipated proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the airspace in the coming years has raised concerns about how to manage their flights to avoid collisions and crashes at various stages of flight. To this end, many Unmanned Aircraft Traffic Management systems (UTM) have been designed. These systems use various methods for managing UAV conflicts. Several surveys have reviewed conflict resolution methods for UAVs. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no survey specifically addressing conflict detection and resolution methods in UTM, particularly those using AI-based methods. Therefore, this article serves as a comprehensive survey of all UAVs conflicts detection and resolution methods proposed in the literature and their use in the UTM systems. This survey classifies the methods into two categories: classical (non-learning) methods and learning-based methods. Classical methods typically rely on pre-defined algorithms or rules for UAVs to avoid collisions, whereas Artificial Intelligence-based methods, including Machine Learning (ML) and especially Reinforcement Learning (RL), enable UAVs to adapt to their environment, autonomously resolve conflicts, and exhibit intelligent behavior based on their experiences. It also presents their application in the conflict resolution service for UTMs. Additionally, the challenges and issues associated with each type of methods are discussed. This article can serve as a foundational resource for researchers in guiding their selection of methods for conflict resolution, particularly those relevant to UTM systems.

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsVol. 26(2)
Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas (FR), Manouba University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
25.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.