Healthcare deservingness: how risk factors and income shape responsibility attribution for health outcomes and healthcare costs

Abstract Amidst the global surge in healthcare expenditures, there is a growing political and academic debate about individual versus collective responsibility for health and healthcare costs. This study explores the causal effects of health risks and income cues on citizens’ attribution of responsibility for health outcomes and healthcare costs. An original vignette experiment was conducted among the German population. Those in need of medical treatment who have been exposed to environmental, institutional, or biological health risks are held less responsible for their health outcomes than those exhibiting behavioural health risks. However, the impact of health risks appears to be somewhat weaker in determining who should bear the costs for the medical treatment. Furthermore, higher-income groups are more likely to be blamed for their health outcomes and are considered less deserving of society’s help in paying for medical treatment. These findings enhance our understanding of how the criteria of control and economic need shape public attribution of responsibility in the health(care) domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Sociological Review
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcae049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare deservingness: how risk factors and income shape responsibility attribution for health outcomes and healthcare costs

Sharon Baute, Luna Bellani
1 citations
European Sociological Review
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
article

Healthcare deservingness: how risk factors and income shape responsibility attribution for health outcomes and healthcare costs

Sharon Baute, Luna Bellani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Amidst the global surge in healthcare expenditures, there is a growing political and academic debate about individual versus collective responsibility for health and healthcare costs. This study explores the causal effects of health risks and income cues on citizens’ attribution of responsibility for health outcomes and healthcare costs. An original vignette experiment was conducted among the German population. Those in need of medical treatment who have been exposed to environmental, institutional, or biological health risks are held less responsible for their health outcomes than those exhibiting behavioural health risks. However, the impact of health risks appears to be somewhat weaker in determining who should bear the costs for the medical treatment. Furthermore, higher-income groups are more likely to be blamed for their health outcomes and are considered less deserving of society’s help in paying for medical treatment. These findings enhance our understanding of how the criteria of control and economic need shape public attribution of responsibility in the health(care) domain.

European Sociological ReviewVol. 41(3)
University of Konstanz (DE), Universität Ulm (DE), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.