The Influence of affective and cognitive appeals on persuasion outcomes: a cross-cultural meta-analysis

Abstract People are frequently exposed to different extents of affective and cognitive appeals, but it remains unclear whether appeals targeting emotions or beliefs are differentially effective across cultures. Hence, this meta-analysis investigates the relative influence of affective versus cognitive appeals for persuasion outcomes as a function of individualism-collectivism. Using 133 samples across 22 countries (N = 29,338), we found affective appeals to be relatively more effective than cognitive appeals in collectivistic societies, but both appeals were similarly effective in individualistic societies. These analyses demonstrate the fruitfulness of examining affective–cognitive appeals through a cultural lens, and suggest new directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae042
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of affective and cognitive appeals on persuasion outcomes: a cross-cultural meta-analysis

Ya Hui Michelle See, Mike W.‐L. Cheung, W.J. Ng
4 citations
Journal of Communication
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.64
article

The Influence of affective and cognitive appeals on persuasion outcomes: a cross-cultural meta-analysis

Ya Hui Michelle See, Mike W.‐L. Cheung, W.J. Ng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract People are frequently exposed to different extents of affective and cognitive appeals, but it remains unclear whether appeals targeting emotions or beliefs are differentially effective across cultures. Hence, this meta-analysis investigates the relative influence of affective versus cognitive appeals for persuasion outcomes as a function of individualism-collectivism. Using 133 samples across 22 countries (N = 29,338), we found affective appeals to be relatively more effective than cognitive appeals in collectivistic societies, but both appeals were similarly effective in individualistic societies. These analyses demonstrate the fruitfulness of examining affective–cognitive appeals through a cultural lens, and suggest new directions for future research.

Journal of CommunicationVol. 75(2)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.