Rentiership and intellectual monopoly in contemporary capitalism: conceptual challenges and empirical possibilities

Abstract In recent years, the concepts of rentiership and intellectual monopoly have gained prominence in discussions about the weakening link between corporate profitability and capital investment in high income countries. However, there have been few if any attempts to construct measures for rentiership and intellectual monopoly using firm-level financial data. The absence of such work, we argue, is symptomatic of challenges in delineating what qualifies as rent—whether it be intangible rent or otherwise. In place of static conceptions of rent and intellectual monopoly, we develop a framework for analyzing rentierization and intellectual monopolization as dynamic and variegated processes that are closely related to financialization. We apply the framework to the analysis of the transformation of non-financial firms in the USA since the mid-twentieth century and show how it helps clarify the linkages between firm-level dynamics and trends associated with household inequality, corporate stratification and secular stagnation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwae076
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rentiership and intellectual monopoly in contemporary capitalism: conceptual challenges and empirical possibilities

Sandy Brian Hager, Joseph Baines
8 citations
Socio-Economic Review
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.31
article

Rentiership and intellectual monopoly in contemporary capitalism: conceptual challenges and empirical possibilities

Sandy Brian Hager, Joseph Baines
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the concepts of rentiership and intellectual monopoly have gained prominence in discussions about the weakening link between corporate profitability and capital investment in high income countries. However, there have been few if any attempts to construct measures for rentiership and intellectual monopoly using firm-level financial data. The absence of such work, we argue, is symptomatic of challenges in delineating what qualifies as rent—whether it be intangible rent or otherwise. In place of static conceptions of rent and intellectual monopoly, we develop a framework for analyzing rentierization and intellectual monopolization as dynamic and variegated processes that are closely related to financialization. We apply the framework to the analysis of the transformation of non-financial firms in the USA since the mid-twentieth century and show how it helps clarify the linkages between firm-level dynamics and trends associated with household inequality, corporate stratification and secular stagnation.

Socio-Economic ReviewVol. 23(4)
City, University of London (GB), King's College London (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.