Bureaucratic Packing in the Brazilian Amazon: How Political Competition Drives Deforestation

What accounts for subnational variation in deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Using satellite imagery data and a novel shift-share instrumental variable design, I explore how local political competition explains this variation. I show that electoral competition causally increases deforestation, especially in the presence of more private commercial interests that deforest. I argue that competition encourages mayors to pursue the strategic non-enforcement of environmental standards to cater to such interests. Drawing on qualitative interviews and administrative data on bureaucratic appointments, I show that to achieve this end, mayors use a strategy I term bureaucratic packing, a surge in appointments of new personnel to bypass existing personnel who may not aid the mayor’s agenda. In contrast to existing theories on the use of appointments for rewarding patrons, the analysis spotlights bureaucratic packing as an understudied strategy used to weaken regulatory capacity. Political competition generates incentives for undermining bureaucratic capacity to allow deforestation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734242
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bureaucratic Packing in the Brazilian Amazon: How Political Competition Drives Deforestation

Alice Xu
1 citations
The Journal of Politics
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
0.28
article

Bureaucratic Packing in the Brazilian Amazon: How Political Competition Drives Deforestation

Alice Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What accounts for subnational variation in deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Using satellite imagery data and a novel shift-share instrumental variable design, I explore how local political competition explains this variation. I show that electoral competition causally increases deforestation, especially in the presence of more private commercial interests that deforest. I argue that competition encourages mayors to pursue the strategic non-enforcement of environmental standards to cater to such interests. Drawing on qualitative interviews and administrative data on bureaucratic appointments, I show that to achieve this end, mayors use a strategy I term bureaucratic packing, a surge in appointments of new personnel to bypass existing personnel who may not aid the mayor’s agenda. In contrast to existing theories on the use of appointments for rewarding patrons, the analysis spotlights bureaucratic packing as an understudied strategy used to weaken regulatory capacity. Political competition generates incentives for undermining bureaucratic capacity to allow deforestation.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(4)
California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.