Unsuccessful Candidates Are More Concerned About Electoral Fairness than Election Winners

Democracy requires the losers of an election to accept their defeat to ensure a peaceful transition of power. However, we know little about how losing affects candidates’ perceptions of the election. Using a regression discontinuity design and survey responses from hundreds of candidates in a country-wide election in Denmark—one of the most robust democracies in the world—we find that candidates who fail to win a seat are more concerned about electoral fairness than election winners. The corresponding effect of losing is 0.46 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.82) points using a five-point electoral fairness index or 0.6 SD. Our findings have important implications because they suggest that the core democratic institution of elections may paradoxically fuel discontent with democracy among the people who are supposed to be its strongest advocates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734240
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsuccessful Candidates Are More Concerned About Electoral Fairness than Election Winners

Henrik Bech Seeberg, Martin Bækgaard, Roman Senninger
1 citations
The Journal of Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
article

Unsuccessful Candidates Are More Concerned About Electoral Fairness than Election Winners

Henrik Bech Seeberg, Martin Bækgaard, Roman Senninger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Democracy requires the losers of an election to accept their defeat to ensure a peaceful transition of power. However, we know little about how losing affects candidates’ perceptions of the election. Using a regression discontinuity design and survey responses from hundreds of candidates in a country-wide election in Denmark—one of the most robust democracies in the world—we find that candidates who fail to win a seat are more concerned about electoral fairness than election winners. The corresponding effect of losing is 0.46 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.82) points using a five-point electoral fairness index or 0.6 SD. Our findings have important implications because they suggest that the core democratic institution of elections may paradoxically fuel discontent with democracy among the people who are supposed to be its strongest advocates.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 88(1)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unsuccessful Candidates Are More Concerned About Electoral Fairness than Election Winners — Henrik Bech Seeberg, Martin Bækgaard, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS